I won’t attempt a review of The Cavalier in the Yellow Doublet, the fifth book of Arturo Pérez-Reverte’s “Captain Alatriste” series, which is set during the decline of the Spanish Empire in the early 17th Century.  Instead, I’ll note in passing that I fully concur with the Amazon customer who says, “The only problem with the Captain Alatriste series is I end up gobbling up each new installment in two or three days and then have to wait another year and a half for the next to come,” and I’ll supply a passage that I think conveys the sense and atmosphere of the tale and of the whole series while underlining some possible relevance to the political interests that normally concern us here.

For some justification on the relevance claim, let me quote John Steele Gordon at Contentions from just last Monday:

Watching the United States go the way of 17th-century Spain, with its power to defend its interests crippled by debts it can’t pay and its enemies emboldened by its weakness, won’t be boring. It will, however, be tragic for all mankind.

The comparison is one I’ve found myself bringing up, too, though its timely appearance makes me wonder if Gordon isn’t also a Captain Alatriste fan who also just finished The Cavalier. (As for broad comparisons of 17th Century Spain’s predicament to that of 21st Century America, one place to start for background might be Wedgewood’s classic The Thirty Years War.)

The passage I promised is from an extended description of a visit to the Queen. Typically for the Alatriste books, our narrator, who has already been slipped a mysterious note by the court jester, provides some illustrative verse (here from Quevedo, also a protagonist), then turns without pause or transition from historical musings to matters of the heart:

Here lies virtue, rough as sin,
Less rich, ’tis true, but feared the more,
With the vanity and dreams it’s buried in.

In the times I am describing, virtues, assuming always that they even existed, had almost all gone to the devil. We were left with nothing but the blind pride and lack of loyalty that would finally drag us into the abyss; and the little dignity we retained became the province of a few isolated individuals, or else appeared on the stages of our theaters — in the poetry of Lope and Calderón, and on the distant battlefields where our veteran troops were still fighting.[…]Each nation is as it is, and what happened in Spain happened.  Yet, since we all went down in the end, perhaps it was better like that, with just a few desperate men salvaging the dignity of the unspeakable rump — as if it were the tattered standard from the Terheyden redoubt — by praying, blaspheming, killing, and fighting to their last breath.  And that, at least, is something.  When anyone asks me what I admire about this poor, sad land of Spain, I always repeat what I said to that French officer in Rocroi:  “Count the dead.”

If you are gentleman enough to escort a lady, wait for me tonight at the Puerta de la Priora when the angelus is rung.

And that was all the note said; there was no signature.  I read it several times, leaning against a column in the courtyard while don Francisco chatted with a group of acquaintances.  Each time I read those words, my heart started pounding in my breast.  During the time that Quevedo and I had been in the presence of the queen, Angélica de Alquézar had displayed no particular interest in me.  She sat surrounded by her whispering companions, and even her smiles were subtle and contained, although, having said that, her blue eyes did occasionally fix on me with such intensity that I feared my legs might buckle.

For that assignation at the Puerta de la Priora, among others, and for all the “praying, blaspheming, killing, and fighting to their last breath,” you’ll have to get the book. You won’t really “ruin” the series if you start it in the middle, though, if you like this kind of thing at all, you won’t regret starting it from the first book, and have plenty of time before the next English language translation appears in print.

* * *

Note: I’ve been thinking of making book reviews and discussion a regular feature, and was inspired by some exchanges at the tail end of a comment thread to make a start. My plan is to note titles as I read them, and whenever possible to provide at least a brief comment or perhaps a striking passage. Time permitting and relevance justifying, I’ll also try to provide full-length reviews. I’ll include Amazon links because I think they’re informative and practical, and especially because I get around 6% commission (!) on any sales they (more or less) directly lead to. I invite other ZC authors to follow my example, if so inclined. If any of you would like some tips on setting up your own “affiliate” accounts, and on dealing with some (annoying) formatting issues, let me know.

Home Page  Public Email  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  Github   

Writing since ancient times, blogging, e-commercing, and site installing-designing-maintaining since 2001; WordPress theme and plugin configuring and developing since 2004 or so; a lifelong freelancer, not associated nor to be associated with any company, publication, party, university, church, or other institution. 

16 comments on “Just read: THE CAVALIER IN THE YELLOW DOUBLET

Commenting at CK MacLeod's

We are determined to encourage thoughtful discussion, so please be respectful to others. We also provide a set of Commenting Options - comment/commenter highlighting and ignoring, and commenter archives that you can access by clicking the commenter options button (). Go to our Commenting Guidelines page for more details, including how to report offensive and spam commenting.

  1. I have been thinking about Obama and 17th Century Spain and 19th/20th England. Why do we fail to learn from those who went down this road before us?

  2. Yes, bankrupted by mindless wars and colonial appetite. You would think we would learn to avoid those forces of society that would propel us thus.

    Oh wait, we did. In the 2008 election. When we turned away from the dark side and embraced hope and change.

    Spain and England had monarchs. We have a Constitution and a republic. No succession issues, no legitmacy issues (OK, Florida 2000). We create wealth. They had to steal theirs.

    See, this is why the left winces when the right insists on the chest thumping pronouncements of American exceptionalism. It seems like a cover for insecurity. Like the body builder bragging about his biceps. And, in fact, it is. America is not so fragile as you think. We are strong and resilient. It was the same during the Cold War, when conservatives saw communists under every bed. If you were truly convinced of the superiority of capitalism, why so little confidence? What do you get from your investment in fear?

  3. My mother’s distant cousins convinced themselves they were “real” Wallensteins, which was undoubtedly a fantasy, so it’s just as well that the most talented of them ended up writing for and about Hollywood. But that’s my personal link to the Thirty Years’ War.
    The difference between Old Spain and America, of course, is that the commercial classes were never considered authentically Spanish by the popular majority whereas they remain quintessentially American. On that I continue to base some optimism.

  4. @Quill: You might want to do a little more thinking before you decide to say that England stole all of its wealth while the US created all of its own.

  5. Fuster, please note my tenses. I was comparing 17th Century Spain and England — when colonies accounted for the bulk of their wealth (stealing) — to present day America — no stealing.

    I would not say the same about 17th-19th century America, when stolen land and labor helped fuel our economic growth. By the same token, I would not accuse 21st century England of stealing.

    Does that clear things up?

  6. Very cool, CKM. Myself, I am waiting for VDH’s novel about Epaminondas to come out. In the meantime, you’re more likely to find me humming the “Battle Hymn of the Republic,” keeping the sights trained on all the aspiring nuclear missileers out there, and polishing the brass.

    Just have a low tolerance for reading about the experience of national decline. Melancholy is a good thing to spend no more than 10 min a day on.

    I’ll keep your affiliate account offer in mind. Grazie tante, bello.

  7. @fuster: That would be correct, except for the spelling.
    It goes CAPTAIN ALATRISTE, PURITY OF BLOOD, THE SUN OVER BREDA, THE KING’S GOLD, and THE CAVALIER, so far, with 9 books in the entire series (and apparently a movie or two that I’ve somehow missed).

  8. @Quill #5 I think that you should start by noting that 17th century England was not the same as mid-18th century England.
    Certainly 17th century England was different from 17th century Spain.

  9. Quill: I’m not sure anyone believes that the sensitive folks on the Left wince out of embarrassment for the chest-thumping insecurity of the Right. The psychobabble is a shabby cloak for a rampant case of European-wannabeism.

  10. OK, CK. I’ve ordering the first book and, as well, I’ve ordered The Thirty Years’ War,(but that was because I’ve always wanted to read a book written by someone named Cecily).

  11. I just hope you did it using my links! Next time, please consider this – tchotchke. I’d be happy to make further suggestions if you’re stuck on gift ideas.

    Seriously though, I think you’ll be happy with the Cap’n, but the 30 YEARS WAR offers far fewer swordfights and not a single love scene that I can recall anyway.

  12. @CK MacLeod: Wow! Thanks again!! That Poop Freeze spray looks like a perfect gift!!

    (Maybe I’ll send one to Howard to augment his hair care if he doesn’t quit his troll-calling.)

Commenter Ignore Button by CK's Plug-Ins

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



Noted & Quoted

TV pundits and op-ed writers of every major newspaper epitomize how the Democratic establishment has already reached a consensus: the 2020 nominee must be a centrist, a Joe Biden, Cory Booker or Kamala Harris–type, preferably. They say that Joe Biden should "run because [his] populist image fits the Democrats’ most successful political strategy of the past generation" (David Leonhardt, New York Times), and though Biden "would be far from an ideal president," he "looks most like the person who could beat Trump" (David Ignatius, Washington Post). Likewise, the same elite pundit class is working overtime to torpedo left-Democratic candidates like Sanders.

For someone who was not acquainted with Piketty's paper, the argument for a centrist Democrat might sound compelling. If the country has tilted to the right, should we elect a candidate closer to the middle than the fringe? If the electorate resembles a left-to-right line, and each voter has a bracketed range of acceptability in which they vote, this would make perfect sense. The only problem is that it doesn't work like that, as Piketty shows.

The reason is that nominating centrist Democrats who don't speak to class issues will result in a great swathe of voters simply not voting. Conversely, right-wing candidates who speak to class issues, but who do so by harnessing a false consciousness — i.e. blaming immigrants and minorities for capitalism's ills, rather than capitalists — will win those same voters who would have voted for a more class-conscious left candidate. Piketty calls this a "bifurcated" voting situation, meaning many voters will connect either with far-right xenophobic nationalists or left-egalitarian internationalists, but perhaps nothing in-between.

Comment →

Understanding Trump’s charisma offers important clues to understanding the problems that the Democrats need to address. Most important, the Democratic candidate must convey a sense that he or she will fulfil the promise of 2008: not piecemeal reform but a genuine, full-scale change in America’s way of thinking. It’s also crucial to recognise that, like Britain, America is at a turning point and must go in one direction or another. Finally, the candidate must speak to Americans’ sense of self-respect linked to social justice and inclusion. While Weber’s analysis of charisma arose from the German situation, it has special relevance to the United States of America, the first mass democracy, whose Constitution invented the institution of the presidency as a recognition of the indispensable role that unique individuals play in history.

Comment →

[E]ven Fox didn’t tout Bartiromo’s big scoops on Trump’s legislative agenda, because 10 months into the Trump presidency, nobody is so foolish as to believe that him saying, “We’re doing a big infrastructure bill,” means that the Trump administration is, in fact, doing a big infrastructure bill. The president just mouths off at turns ignorantly and dishonestly, and nobody pays much attention to it unless he says something unusually inflammatory.On some level, it’s a little bit funny. On another level, Puerto Rico is still languishing in the dark without power (and in many cases without safe drinking water) with no end in sight. Trump is less popular at this point in his administration than any previous president despite a generally benign economic climate, and shows no sign of changing course. Perhaps it will all work out for the best, and someday we’ll look back and chuckle about the time when we had a president who didn’t know anything about anything that was happening and could never be counted on to make coherent, factual statements on any subject. But traditionally, we haven’t elected presidents like that — for what have always seemed like pretty good reasons — and the risks of compounding disaster are still very much out there.

Comment →
CK's WP Plugins


Extraordinary Comments

CK's WP Plugins