The great set-up

In the process of wrapping up a detailed “crystall ball” prediction on the mid-term elections – House takeover for the Rs, Senate on the bubble, big gains among governorships – the very non-partisan political scientist Larry Sabato makes the following observation:

It is not that Republicans are popular—most polls show the party even less liked than the Democrats. Many observers find it amazing that the less-liked party is on the verge of triumphing over the better-liked party. Nevertheless, in the time-honored American way, voters will be inclined to punish the party in-power by checking and balancing it with more members from the opposition party.

Sabato also adds an interesting historical note that should further gladden the hearts of Republican partisans:

Since World War II, the House of Representatives has flipped parties on six occasions (1946, 1948, 1952, 1954, 1994, and 2006). Every time, the Senate flipped too, even when it had not been predicted to do so. These few examples do not create an iron law of politics, but they do suggest an electoral tendency.

If the Rs gain control in a wave of that magnitude, one would expect some pressure on them to do something, to try something. Other than to shout about Muslims, and further obstruct Obama, their mandate seems to be to cut taxes and spur economic growth, and yet also to bring the budget under control, while a significant wing of their coalition believes defense spending is sacrosanct, and needs to be increased.

The logical and mathematical implications would seem to be either a political real assault on entitlements and domestic spending… or general political gridlock heading into 2012.  The former is difficult.  The latter is what American politicians are good at.  To whatever extent they try the former, it will give Obama an opportunity to stand up as the last safety before the goal line on the Good Society, and to pick an issue or two for Clintonian triangulation.

Too many other major questions will still need to be resolved for anyone to venture a prediction about the next presidential race, but, whoever wins and however he or she wins, the shape of the American discussion appears set, and its course may yet turn the 2010 wave, assuming it occurs as predicted, as a rather minor historical footnote.

But a lot of my old friends will enjoy it at least in the same way a sports fan enjoys watching his team win a championship.  That’s not nothing.  Not quite.

4 comments on “The great set-up

Commenting at CK MacLeod's

We are determined to encourage thoughtful discussion, so please be respectful to others. We also provide a set of Commenting Options - comment/commenter highlighting and ignoring, and commenter archives that you can access by clicking the commenter options button (). Go to our Commenting Guidelines page for more details, including how to report offensive and spam commenting.

  1. If unemployment stays high,2012 could produce another turnover surge. If there’s another “disaster”,like 9/11,or Weimar,well,Last in,First Out. All things being equal,Obama could win in 2012,despite being the “Weakest” President in my memory which goes back to Eisenhower,and I define weakest,in the sense that he was positioned in 2009,to make some coherent policy,but he made a mess of it,so far trying to be the great uniter.
    Until,the Republicans find a unifying candidate like Reagan/Nixon,I’ll assume Obama will win.
    My dream election in 2012 would be Obama/Palin,but too often,my dreams fail to solidfy.

  2. The logical and mathematical implications would seem to be either a political assault on entitlements and domestic spending… or general political gridlock heading into 2012.

    I don’t see why IF/THEN is the logical logical operator. The logical possibilities include both and neither. I tend toward the expection that they will find a way to find satisy all the possibilites, creating a kind of political Moebius strip. The only other question is whether the twist is clockwise or couterclockwise.

  3. @ bob:
    Mmmmm… that sounds like all = nothing at all, which is what I think, too. My use of the word “political” may have been misleading. I should have said “authentic” or “real.” In other words, if you going to keep defense static or even expand it, and you’re going to cut taxes, and you’re going to make progress on overspending, and by some calculations even if you’re not going to try the first two, you’d need to do something no one’s ever done in this country. I’m leaving out the possibility of a massive economic boom…

  4. There will have to be an attempt, this time the damage inposed by this administration, is magnitudes worse than the Clinton era, something like the Roadmap will have to be tried. I mean what has been tried in the last year and a half, really had no chance to work.
    Romer’s own research confirmed the point, years ago,

Commenter Ignore Button by CK's Plug-Ins

Leave a Reply to miguel cervantes Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *