Two-Way Street – Frank Rich on Iraq

Frank Rich’s Sunday NYT column concludes on what I think is meant to be a savagely ironic note:

Of all the pro forma passages in Obama’s speech, perhaps the most jarring was his entreaty that Iraq’s leaders “move forward with a sense of urgency to form an inclusive government that is just, representative and accountable.” He might as well have been talking about the poisonous political deadlock in Washington. At that moment, there was no escaping the tragic fact that instead of bringing American-style democracy and freedom to Iraq, the costly war we fought there has, if anything, brought the bitter taste of Iraq’s dysfunction to America.

It’s not just a third world nation’s dysfunction that our violent intimacy with Iraq has brought to us.  The most privileged nation in the world met, via its military operations, one of the most miserable, over the course, so far, of 20, not merely 7-8, years.  I imagine a kind of vast historical siphoning process: our surplus of will and power and ignorance forced down the already opened channel between the two culture-states, their miseries returning in the other direction in a bloody slurry of human wreckage, impelled to fill our moral vacuum – a two-way empathetic exchange.  No one is in a position to identify what else we and they may have taken on or absorbed as a result of this not yet completed process, though almost everyone brought to offer an opinion seems compelled to submit a judgment and assign fault.  The only thing that seems certain is that virtually no one – few whom I’ve encountered, anyway – seems to have much empathy to spare on this issue.  Seems to have all been used up.

(Further discussion at “The Iraq Syndrome” and comments under “No Alternatives.”)

Home Page  Public Email  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  Github   

Writing since ancient times, blogging, e-commercing, and site installing-designing-maintaining since 2001; WordPress theme and plugin configuring and developing since 2004 or so; a lifelong freelancer, not associated nor to be associated with any company, publication, party, university, church, or other institution. 

8 comments on “Two-Way Street – Frank Rich on Iraq

Commenting at CK MacLeod's

We are determined to encourage thoughtful discussion, so please be respectful to others. We also provide a set of Commenting Options - comment/commenter highlighting and ignoring, and commenter archives that you can access by clicking the commenter options button (). Go to our Commenting Guidelines page for more details, including how to report offensive and spam commenting.

  1. I welcome myself to Tea Land.
    “Therefore, when a U.S. president wages what might otherwise be considered a just war, if he has failed to secure a congressional declaration of war, he is waging an illegal war — illegal from the standpoint of our own legal and governmental system. And when the American people support any such war, no matter how just and right they believe it is, they are standing not only against their own principles and heritage, not only against their own system of government and laws, but also against the only barrier standing between them and the tyranny of their own government — the Constitution.”

  2. Yes, because it is Iraq, that is forcing the Congress not to submit a budget this year, please give me a break. The Phillipine War that grew
    out from the Spanish American war, but soon took on a life of it’s own, complete with the first real anti Imperialist movement, which Carnegie
    was a part of, is a better parallel.

  3. BTW,MC,

    Dave Petraeus just got involved in the Burn the Koran day in St Petersburg Fla.,DP told the press that burning the Koran would put our soldiers at greater risk,not that Book Burning is a Nazi thing to do.

  4. It’s a stupid and counterproductive thing to do, the fact that Petraeus was receiving the information from sources in Afghanistan and Indonesia, indicates that much like those additional Mohammed cartoons, that Abu Laban circulated around the Middle East, they
    might be spiking the message with some extra oomph

  5. CK wrote

    though almost everyone brought to offer an opinion seems compelled to submit a judgment and assign fault

    Assigning blame is pretty much the only thing we have left for creating a sense of control.

Commenter Ignore Button by CK's Plug-Ins

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



Noted & Quoted

TV pundits and op-ed writers of every major newspaper epitomize how the Democratic establishment has already reached a consensus: the 2020 nominee must be a centrist, a Joe Biden, Cory Booker or Kamala Harris–type, preferably. They say that Joe Biden should "run because [his] populist image fits the Democrats’ most successful political strategy of the past generation" (David Leonhardt, New York Times), and though Biden "would be far from an ideal president," he "looks most like the person who could beat Trump" (David Ignatius, Washington Post). Likewise, the same elite pundit class is working overtime to torpedo left-Democratic candidates like Sanders.

For someone who was not acquainted with Piketty's paper, the argument for a centrist Democrat might sound compelling. If the country has tilted to the right, should we elect a candidate closer to the middle than the fringe? If the electorate resembles a left-to-right line, and each voter has a bracketed range of acceptability in which they vote, this would make perfect sense. The only problem is that it doesn't work like that, as Piketty shows.

The reason is that nominating centrist Democrats who don't speak to class issues will result in a great swathe of voters simply not voting. Conversely, right-wing candidates who speak to class issues, but who do so by harnessing a false consciousness — i.e. blaming immigrants and minorities for capitalism's ills, rather than capitalists — will win those same voters who would have voted for a more class-conscious left candidate. Piketty calls this a "bifurcated" voting situation, meaning many voters will connect either with far-right xenophobic nationalists or left-egalitarian internationalists, but perhaps nothing in-between.

Comment →

Understanding Trump’s charisma offers important clues to understanding the problems that the Democrats need to address. Most important, the Democratic candidate must convey a sense that he or she will fulfil the promise of 2008: not piecemeal reform but a genuine, full-scale change in America’s way of thinking. It’s also crucial to recognise that, like Britain, America is at a turning point and must go in one direction or another. Finally, the candidate must speak to Americans’ sense of self-respect linked to social justice and inclusion. While Weber’s analysis of charisma arose from the German situation, it has special relevance to the United States of America, the first mass democracy, whose Constitution invented the institution of the presidency as a recognition of the indispensable role that unique individuals play in history.

Comment →

[E]ven Fox didn’t tout Bartiromo’s big scoops on Trump’s legislative agenda, because 10 months into the Trump presidency, nobody is so foolish as to believe that him saying, “We’re doing a big infrastructure bill,” means that the Trump administration is, in fact, doing a big infrastructure bill. The president just mouths off at turns ignorantly and dishonestly, and nobody pays much attention to it unless he says something unusually inflammatory.On some level, it’s a little bit funny. On another level, Puerto Rico is still languishing in the dark without power (and in many cases without safe drinking water) with no end in sight. Trump is less popular at this point in his administration than any previous president despite a generally benign economic climate, and shows no sign of changing course. Perhaps it will all work out for the best, and someday we’ll look back and chuckle about the time when we had a president who didn’t know anything about anything that was happening and could never be counted on to make coherent, factual statements on any subject. But traditionally, we haven’t elected presidents like that — for what have always seemed like pretty good reasons — and the risks of compounding disaster are still very much out there.

Comment →
CK's WP Plugins


Extraordinary Comments

CK's WP Plugins