East-West Past-Future Materialist-Spiritualist Fusion

I know I should be coming up with a Thanskgiving message – how about “Thanks for sticking around!”? – or watching football, or cleaning up the house while preparing to head out for the family shindig.  Instead, I found myself putting this post together.

Here are five very modern, in other ways old songs – “Eastern” artists with instruments, arrangements, production all in some way reliant on “Western/American” technology and aesthetics, brought to us on the internet… but I’ll leave further discussion of the larger themes to some other time…

[myyoutubeplaylist F1ZeVicy5PE, 4QyQAG7mvpM, dpkiK0J_IZU, FxBxeChwJEM, RLl_dbuxwVE]

Some info on the artists:

  • Rez Abbasi & Kiran Ahluwalia – The first piece, “Things to Come,” is new to me, but I like it a lot – as an “art” video, and as a vehicle for the Pakistani-American guitarist-composer Rez Abbasi (from his album under the same title).  Kiran Ahluwalia provides the ethereal vocals.  Abbasi also plays guitar on “Teray Darsan,” Ahluwalia’s setting of the lyrics of a typical Ghazal:  The beloved as simultaneously a human lover and the divine.  I believe Ahluwalia still carries a Canadian passport, but, in
    re-connecting with her “other” heritage, she dedicated herself to
    interpreting traditional music for the present era. 
  • Raghu Dixit – from India… I know a lot less about him, except that he may be something of a sensation or on the verge of becoming one.  His band fuses traditional Indian folk stylings with rock’n’roll.  The first song is one of the folkier selections available on YouTube.  The second song – “No Man Will Ever Love You Like I Do” is not a re-settting of “You’ll Never Find…”
  • Arif Lohar & Meesha Shafi: Pakistani, with a setting of the Sufi folk song Alif Allah Chambey Di Bootey.  The prominently featured Coke Studio sponsorship to me completes rather than detracts from the sense of “fusion” between East and West, empyreal and mundane, spiritual and political.  The song came to our attention a few months ago when it was mentioned by a Pakistani writer who was decrying fundamentalist violence against peaceable Sufis.

(Also wanted to show fuster and y’all another way to present a set of ‘tubes.)

Home Page  Public Email  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  Github   

Writing since ancient times, blogging, e-commercing, and site installing-designing-maintaining since 2001; WordPress theme and plugin configuring and developing since 2004 or so; a lifelong freelancer, not associated nor to be associated with any company, publication, party, university, church, or other institution. 

5 comments on “East-West Past-Future Materialist-Spiritualist Fusion

Commenting at CK MacLeod's

We are determined to encourage thoughtful discussion, so please be respectful to others. We also provide a set of Commenting Options - comment/commenter highlighting and ignoring, and commenter archives that you can access by clicking the commenter options button (). Go to our Commenting Guidelines page for more details, including how to report offensive and spam commenting.

  1. I was near as impressed with the presentation as I was with the performances.

    No 3 was most interesting. Sounding almost Celtic.

    Loved the last even more than when I last heard it.

    Thankee much for all.

  2. Interesting observation about the Celticness of the sound on that song… I like the way his voice sounds like a pop crooner than zooms off into those very Eastern legato lines

    Couldn’t be more simple to do the presentation:

    Just put the following in any post:

    [myyoutubeplaylist codenumber, codenumber, codenumber, codenumber]

    where codenumber is the sequence of letters and numbers that appear italicized in the following URL.


    in other words, the gobbledygook between the “=” and the “&” on any Youtube URL

    You can use any number of songs.

    The application will do the rest in terms of formatting the main image and the menu thumbnails. There are more bells&whistley apps that allow for more complicated layouts and interactions and decorations, but I thought this one was a good starting point.

  3. Hi There,
    Thanks for putting these up. Just a correction – Things To Come, the “art video” is a composition by myself and on my recording with the same title. The second video is Kiran’s and it is also an original composition, of hers. She mostly composes her own music to modern and older Ghazals. Best Wishes,

  4. @ Rez Abbasi:
    You’re quite welcome, doubly. Didn’t mean to imply anything other than that the song – which I found at Ms. Ahluwalia’s site – is yours, but I’ve added some notes for clarity.

    Great video, by the way – the simple, cinematic concept that in combination with the music creates, evokes, and sustains a subjective “moment” instead of seeing how many cuts, how much unrelated narrative, how many tricks, or how many shots of the artist and fans it can fit into a couple of minutes.

  5. CK MacLeod wrote:

    Great video, by the way – the simple, cinematic concept that in combination with the music creates, evokes, and sustain a subjective “moment” instead of seeing how many cuts, how much unrelated narrative, how many tricks, or how many shots of the artist and fans it can fit into a couple of minutes.

    Right on.

Commenter Ignore Button by CK's Plug-Ins

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



Noted & Quoted

TV pundits and op-ed writers of every major newspaper epitomize how the Democratic establishment has already reached a consensus: the 2020 nominee must be a centrist, a Joe Biden, Cory Booker or Kamala Harris–type, preferably. They say that Joe Biden should "run because [his] populist image fits the Democrats’ most successful political strategy of the past generation" (David Leonhardt, New York Times), and though Biden "would be far from an ideal president," he "looks most like the person who could beat Trump" (David Ignatius, Washington Post). Likewise, the same elite pundit class is working overtime to torpedo left-Democratic candidates like Sanders.

For someone who was not acquainted with Piketty's paper, the argument for a centrist Democrat might sound compelling. If the country has tilted to the right, should we elect a candidate closer to the middle than the fringe? If the electorate resembles a left-to-right line, and each voter has a bracketed range of acceptability in which they vote, this would make perfect sense. The only problem is that it doesn't work like that, as Piketty shows.

The reason is that nominating centrist Democrats who don't speak to class issues will result in a great swathe of voters simply not voting. Conversely, right-wing candidates who speak to class issues, but who do so by harnessing a false consciousness — i.e. blaming immigrants and minorities for capitalism's ills, rather than capitalists — will win those same voters who would have voted for a more class-conscious left candidate. Piketty calls this a "bifurcated" voting situation, meaning many voters will connect either with far-right xenophobic nationalists or left-egalitarian internationalists, but perhaps nothing in-between.

Comment →

Understanding Trump’s charisma offers important clues to understanding the problems that the Democrats need to address. Most important, the Democratic candidate must convey a sense that he or she will fulfil the promise of 2008: not piecemeal reform but a genuine, full-scale change in America’s way of thinking. It’s also crucial to recognise that, like Britain, America is at a turning point and must go in one direction or another. Finally, the candidate must speak to Americans’ sense of self-respect linked to social justice and inclusion. While Weber’s analysis of charisma arose from the German situation, it has special relevance to the United States of America, the first mass democracy, whose Constitution invented the institution of the presidency as a recognition of the indispensable role that unique individuals play in history.

Comment →

[E]ven Fox didn’t tout Bartiromo’s big scoops on Trump’s legislative agenda, because 10 months into the Trump presidency, nobody is so foolish as to believe that him saying, “We’re doing a big infrastructure bill,” means that the Trump administration is, in fact, doing a big infrastructure bill. The president just mouths off at turns ignorantly and dishonestly, and nobody pays much attention to it unless he says something unusually inflammatory.On some level, it’s a little bit funny. On another level, Puerto Rico is still languishing in the dark without power (and in many cases without safe drinking water) with no end in sight. Trump is less popular at this point in his administration than any previous president despite a generally benign economic climate, and shows no sign of changing course. Perhaps it will all work out for the best, and someday we’ll look back and chuckle about the time when we had a president who didn’t know anything about anything that was happening and could never be counted on to make coherent, factual statements on any subject. But traditionally, we haven’t elected presidents like that — for what have always seemed like pretty good reasons — and the risks of compounding disaster are still very much out there.

Comment →
CK's WP Plugins


Extraordinary Comments

CK's WP Plugins