Assyria next! – UPDATED

And the Eternal shall make Himself known to Egypt, and the Egyptians shall know the Eternal that day; yea, they shall worship with sacrifice and offering, and shall vow a vow unto the Eternal and shall perform it…

–Isaiah 19:21

Though I kinda wish that Hosni would make his speech already… and then there’ll be a bunch of reaction and analysis and analysis of analysis and reaction to analysis…

Here’s video of Tahrir Square:

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

(Skimming the typically paranoid and Islamophobic and Obamaphobic comments at HotAir, I’ve never been gladder to have dropped those losers.)

Wanted to say, let’s wrap this up so CK can get to work… but maybe that’s hopeless…  The show must go on…

UPDATE

Next verse:  Isaiah 19:22 :  It’s almost as though they were trying to provoke a violent reaction and/or justify a coup.


WordPresser
Home Page  Public Email  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  Github   

Writing since ancient times, blogging, e-commercing, and site installing-designing-maintaining since 2001; WordPress theme and plugin configuring and developing since 2004 or so; a lifelong freelancer, not associated nor to be associated with any company, publication, party, university, church, or other institution.

5 comments on “Assyria next! – UPDATED

Commenting at CK MacLeod's

We are determined to encourage thoughtful discussion, so please be respectful to others. We also provide a set of Commenting Options - comment/commenter highlighting and ignoring, and commenter archives that you can access by clicking the commenter options button (). Go to our Commenting Guidelines page for more details, including how to report offensive and spam commenting.

  1. what’s bothering you about the comments at HotAir?

    How could anyone in the Middle East hate America that much? 9/11 was bad; but this is worse.

    logis on February 10, 2011 at 12:34 PM

    they seem reasonable.

  2. @ fuster:
    I don’t understand that one. I know it must be something foul, but I don’t understand it.

    However, if you’re going to start ribbiting at MW, I just might have to break my HA fast and join you there. I’ve been sorely tempted several times lately.

    I’m a little afeared though of what might transpire with you at MW. You’re right about there being some pretty fierce ideologues over there. I was just yesterday called “Hasbara” (had to look it up) for the first time. On the other hand, I ran into a couple of guys who are also into the Herman Cohen stuff… Where else is that likely to happen?

  3. CK MacLeod wrote:

    I don’t understand that one. I know it must be something foul, but I don’t understand it.

    that one was someone saying that the Egyptians are trying to toss Mubarak because Egyptians hate the US and if Mubarak goes it’ll be the worstest ever.

    I don’t want you to worry about the nasty people at Mondoweiss being mean to me. I’ll be …OK.

    I did warn you about that hasbara stuff.

    “fierce ideologues” is pretty funny, Tsar. Meier Kahane was a fierce ideologue as well, but he wrote with a little more restraint than some of these folks.

  4. fuster wrote:

    that one was someone saying that the Egyptians are trying to toss Mubarak because Egyptians hate the US and if Mubarak goes it’ll be the worstest ever.

    Well, if Scott wasn’t pre-occupied, he might be able to supply us with the Yogic term for the foul stupidity that surpasseth understanding.

    As for HA vs MW and a lot else on the web: The spirit of the internet, especially in blog comments, is negative in the philosophical sense. This negativity often gets converted into simple crude expressions, and is also subjected to a tendency to compensate for anomie and disconnection with exaggerated false familiarity and bad manners – statements that seem to provide emotion, presence, individuality, shape…

  5. CK MacLeod wrote:

    and is also subjected to a tendency to compensate for anomie and disconnection with exaggerated false familiarity and bad manners – statements that seem to provide emotion, presence, individuality, shape…

    yes, I’ve found that I fit right in.

Commenter Ignore Button by CK's Plug-Ins

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Related

Noted & Quoted

TV pundits and op-ed writers of every major newspaper epitomize how the Democratic establishment has already reached a consensus: the 2020 nominee must be a centrist, a Joe Biden, Cory Booker or Kamala Harris–type, preferably. They say that Joe Biden should "run because [his] populist image fits the Democrats’ most successful political strategy of the past generation" (David Leonhardt, New York Times), and though Biden "would be far from an ideal president," he "looks most like the person who could beat Trump" (David Ignatius, Washington Post). Likewise, the same elite pundit class is working overtime to torpedo left-Democratic candidates like Sanders.

For someone who was not acquainted with Piketty's paper, the argument for a centrist Democrat might sound compelling. If the country has tilted to the right, should we elect a candidate closer to the middle than the fringe? If the electorate resembles a left-to-right line, and each voter has a bracketed range of acceptability in which they vote, this would make perfect sense. The only problem is that it doesn't work like that, as Piketty shows.

The reason is that nominating centrist Democrats who don't speak to class issues will result in a great swathe of voters simply not voting. Conversely, right-wing candidates who speak to class issues, but who do so by harnessing a false consciousness — i.e. blaming immigrants and minorities for capitalism's ills, rather than capitalists — will win those same voters who would have voted for a more class-conscious left candidate. Piketty calls this a "bifurcated" voting situation, meaning many voters will connect either with far-right xenophobic nationalists or left-egalitarian internationalists, but perhaps nothing in-between.

Comment →

Understanding Trump’s charisma offers important clues to understanding the problems that the Democrats need to address. Most important, the Democratic candidate must convey a sense that he or she will fulfil the promise of 2008: not piecemeal reform but a genuine, full-scale change in America’s way of thinking. It’s also crucial to recognise that, like Britain, America is at a turning point and must go in one direction or another. Finally, the candidate must speak to Americans’ sense of self-respect linked to social justice and inclusion. While Weber’s analysis of charisma arose from the German situation, it has special relevance to the United States of America, the first mass democracy, whose Constitution invented the institution of the presidency as a recognition of the indispensable role that unique individuals play in history.

Comment →

[E]ven Fox didn’t tout Bartiromo’s big scoops on Trump’s legislative agenda, because 10 months into the Trump presidency, nobody is so foolish as to believe that him saying, “We’re doing a big infrastructure bill,” means that the Trump administration is, in fact, doing a big infrastructure bill. The president just mouths off at turns ignorantly and dishonestly, and nobody pays much attention to it unless he says something unusually inflammatory.On some level, it’s a little bit funny. On another level, Puerto Rico is still languishing in the dark without power (and in many cases without safe drinking water) with no end in sight. Trump is less popular at this point in his administration than any previous president despite a generally benign economic climate, and shows no sign of changing course. Perhaps it will all work out for the best, and someday we’ll look back and chuckle about the time when we had a president who didn’t know anything about anything that was happening and could never be counted on to make coherent, factual statements on any subject. But traditionally, we haven’t elected presidents like that — for what have always seemed like pretty good reasons — and the risks of compounding disaster are still very much out there.

Comment →
CK's WP Plugins

Categories

Extraordinary Comments

CK's WP Plugins