I might like you better if we negotiated together

In Obama’s push for Mideast peace, whose side is he on? – The Washington Post

 

Rather than bargain with Israel, Abbas seems inclined to go along with his aides’ plan to seek a U.N. declaration of Palestinian statehood at the next General Assembly in September.

This might not be so troubling for Netanyahu, who is also not eager to make concessions for a peace deal, if not for his second problem: Obama continues to believe that Israel’s government, and not the Palestinians, is the primary obstacle to peace.

The president made his mind-set clear from the beginning of his administration, when he chose to begin his diplomacy by demanding a complete freeze on Israeli settlement activity — a condition Abbas had never set but which he quickly adopted as his own. In a meeting with American Jewish leaders at the White House this month, Obama indicated that he hadn’t changed his mind. Abbas, he insisted, was ready to establish a Palestinian state. The problem was that Israel had not made a serious territorial offer.

Netanyahu feels compelled to counter the Palestinian offensive at the United Nations, which his defense minister, Ehud Barak, says could turn into “an anti-Israeli diplomatic tsunami.” For that he will need the support of Obama. So Netanyahu has committed himself to deliver what could be the most-anticipated speech in Israel’s history — an address to the U.S. Congress in May in which he is to lay out a new “vision” for peace.

To satisfy Abbas and Obama, Netanyahu will have to promise a significant concession. In the words of the Israeli commentator Akiva Eldar, “he will have to utter, with his own mouth, the magic words” — that a Palestinian state will be based on Israel returning to its 1967 borders. But if he does that, Netanyahu will infuriate most of his cabinet and probably cause the collapse of his coalition. His supporters believe he will also give up Israel’s best negotiating chip — territory — before the real bargaining even begins.

Netanyahu felt comfortable enough with the Gaza mini-war and the state of security in Jerusalem last week to carry on with a planned trip to Russia. The coming showdown with Obama will require his full attention.

 

4 comments on “I might like you better if we negotiated together

Commenting at CK MacLeod's

We are determined to encourage thoughtful discussion, so please be respectful to others. We also provide a set of Commenting Options - comment/commenter highlighting and ignoring, and commenter archives that you can access by clicking the commenter options button (). Go to our Commenting Guidelines page for more details, including how to report offensive and spam commenting.

  1. I like the tactic of seeking a declaration of statehood for Palestine bypassing the need to sit with the Israelis.

    It’ll satisfy the Palestinian need to avoid the obvious shame of having to admit their defeat and give the illusion that they’ve forced the Zionists to submit to terms.

    Hopefully the UN will draw the borders of the new Palestinian state to include Jordan, the Golan Heights and Lebanon up to, and including, Beirut. That’ll return to the Palestinians much of the territory that Arafat attempted to secure but failed to retain.

  2. Bibi will never agree to that, the UN is not clever enough to do this,
    truth is Egypt and Syria would likely carve up what ever Palestinian
    statelet arises.

  3. @ miguel cervantes:

    why would they? Egypt has never wanted the worthless piece of land that makes up Gaza and now that it’s filled with a million plus angry people accustomed to being both fed and abused, it’s less than worthless.

  4. They did hold it, between 1948 and 1967, but you’re partially right, it’s second cousin to Klendathu.

Commenter Ignore Button by CK's Plug-Ins

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*