On behalf of the uncorrupted core and true legacy, I say those wanna-bes can go pound sand, of which they got lots

The quasi-$40 billion Arab-democracy-roulette caper « Theoptimisticconservative’s Blog

The Arab Spring has resulted so far in a series of bloody crackdowns, one full-scale civil war, and two nations (Tunisia and Egypt) under new but non-elected, still-autocratic government.  We can certainly hope that both Tunisia and Egypt will hold the elections promised to the people.  Whether those elections will produce self-sustaining consensual polities, with liberal ideals and peaceful changes of government, is another question.

There is no reason to hope that “economic aid” will promote this outcome.  Economic aid given for precisely the purpose of promoting liberalism and democracy has a long history; the liberal developed world has been shoveling such aid at the less-developed world since the 1950s, and its track record is poor.  Without a prior commitment to the rule of law and government transparency in the recipient nations, such funds are frequently misappropriated.  In fact, “economic aid” provided by illiberal investors (China, Russia, Saudi Arabia) is more likely to go to the purposes intended by the donors, because those donors are perfectly forthright about their own interests and the strings attached.

But the good news about all this is that the event described in the international media – “the G-8 pledging $40 billion to emerging Arab democracies” – is a chimera.  The episode is largely an exercise in posturing and narrative-building, with the full complicity of the news media.  A more accurate rendition of it would go something like this: “G-8 may borrow $10 billion more from China and co-sign at development banks to aid unspecified Arab governments; conditions, timing vague; Saudis, others make own pledge.”

It’s worth noting the disconnect here, between the daily life of the average G-8 taxpayer – full of accountability and hard realities – and the all-but-counterfactual narrative-building that characterizes many in their governments and media.  The people who represent the true legacy of the West may have little voice today in the centers of power and strategic communication, but there remains an uncorrupted core, in Europe and North America and a few other outposts around the globe.  History tells us we don’t have to start with more than that, to prevail in our own generation.


8 comments on “On behalf of the uncorrupted core and true legacy, I say those wanna-bes can go pound sand, of which they got lots

Commenting at CK MacLeod's

We are determined to encourage thoughtful discussion, so please be respectful to others. We also provide a set of Commenting Options - comment/commenter highlighting and ignoring, and commenter archives that you can access by clicking the commenter options button (). Go to our Commenting Guidelines page for more details, including how to report offensive and spam commenting.

  1. Thinking? I think she gave that up. But it ends up revealing the “uncorrupted core” and “true legacy” of her remnant thought (or Victor Davis Hanson’s remnant thought through a Reagan-Goldwater militarist libertarian’s lens) for what it may always have been.

  2. It seems naive, for anyone who hasn’t read Al Aswani or Souief, or any of a host of others, if one was confident that someone of good character like a Nour, or someone like him, then that might allay
    some concerns.

    Really, highlander, this pidgen derivation of Perlstein, cribbing off Hofstadler is very silly

  3. Hanson is a Democrat, of the Reagan type, not to be caricatured as a militarism, Perlstein seems to have eschewed everything he learned in his two biographies, of Goldwater and Nixon, to dwell on the stereotypes of the authoritarian personalities of Hofstadler and

  4. No one said nuthin bout no thoritarian personality types ceppin you, Don Miguel.

    Militarist libertarianism is the unstable element I’d assign to JED, not to VDH. It’s the “consensual government” and “legacy of the West” that I think the former is mainly borrowing from the latter, without attribution. Goldwater stands for her extremism in defense of libertary-ism, as G, though also standing for total electoral thumping, still represents the highest political profile ever attained by the libertarian reaction to liberalism/statism, at least since Coolidge, which was in a very different era, to say the least. The Reaganaut part is the second order mutation of Goldwaterism, that makes its peace with the Washington consensus by happily magnifying and augmenting the national security state then entering a long, demagogic/deceptive twilight struggle with liberalism.

Commenter Ignore Button by CK's Plug-Ins

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *