Alexey Terehoff


Here’s a version of “Capital” with subtitles -- you may have to watch it full screen in order to read them:

I’ve kept the I believe higher quality Vimeo version below (tho if you click on 720p on the YouTube its pretty good, haven’t performed a closer inspection yet):

«Capital» Lyapis Trubetskoy from Alexey TEREHOFF on Vimeo.

surrealistic pop-art with a cynical view on world politics created in high energy frames for pop music channels. could the apocalypse be near? tried and tested technologies with deadly
composing and a pint of morphing for good measure.

(Lyrics Below)

-- Top 50 Music Videos of 2007, Staff List by Mark Richardson and Scott Plagenhoef
-- Festival ViMus 2007, Póvoa de Varzim, Portugal, Special Award of the Jury-International Competition
-- RAMP (Rock Alternative Music Prize) 2007, Moscow, Russia, 1st Prize, Best music video of the year,
-- Multimatograph 3, 2007 Festival of non-commercial animation and video art; Winner in “Video art”
-- First Annual Musical Award in the domain of rock-n-roll “Chartova Dyuzhyna. Top 13” 2008, Moscow, Russia, 1st Prize, Best music video
-- Rock Coronation, 2008 Minsk, Belarus, 1st Prize, Rock Crown, Best music video of the year


I eat for dinner golden bullions
Diamond dessert and oil cream
My name of Beelzebub
The master of the stratosphere
Im so gratefully cool my respects without measure

In my left hand Snickers in my right hand Mars
My PR manager is Karl Marx
Capital! Capital! Capital! Capital!

I eat your cities and drink your oceans
My beard is obscuring the sky
Thunders and lightnings, fogs and rains
My shoes are licked by ministers and chiefs

In my left hand Snickers in my right hand Mars
My PR manager is Karl Marx
Capital! Capital! Capital! Capital!

My face Madonna, in a rotten pear
Everyone on your knees!
The orchestra, flourish!
Capital! Capital! Capital! Capital!

Home Page  Public Email  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  Github   

Writing since ancient times, blogging, e-commercing, and site installing-designing-maintaining since 2001; WordPress theme and plugin configuring and developing since 2004 or so; a lifelong freelancer, not associated nor to be associated with any company, publication, party, university, church, or other institution.

3 comments on “Alexey Terehoff

Commenting at CK MacLeod's

We are determined to encourage thoughtful discussion, so please be respectful to others. We also provide a set of Commenting Options - comment/commenter highlighting and ignoring, and commenter archives that you can access by clicking the commenter options button (). Go to our Commenting Guidelines page for more details, including how to report offensive and spam commenting.

Commenter Ignore Button by CK's Plug-Ins

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



Noted & Quoted

TV pundits and op-ed writers of every major newspaper epitomize how the Democratic establishment has already reached a consensus: the 2020 nominee must be a centrist, a Joe Biden, Cory Booker or Kamala Harris–type, preferably. They say that Joe Biden should "run because [his] populist image fits the Democrats’ most successful political strategy of the past generation" (David Leonhardt, New York Times), and though Biden "would be far from an ideal president," he "looks most like the person who could beat Trump" (David Ignatius, Washington Post). Likewise, the same elite pundit class is working overtime to torpedo left-Democratic candidates like Sanders.

For someone who was not acquainted with Piketty's paper, the argument for a centrist Democrat might sound compelling. If the country has tilted to the right, should we elect a candidate closer to the middle than the fringe? If the electorate resembles a left-to-right line, and each voter has a bracketed range of acceptability in which they vote, this would make perfect sense. The only problem is that it doesn't work like that, as Piketty shows.

The reason is that nominating centrist Democrats who don't speak to class issues will result in a great swathe of voters simply not voting. Conversely, right-wing candidates who speak to class issues, but who do so by harnessing a false consciousness — i.e. blaming immigrants and minorities for capitalism's ills, rather than capitalists — will win those same voters who would have voted for a more class-conscious left candidate. Piketty calls this a "bifurcated" voting situation, meaning many voters will connect either with far-right xenophobic nationalists or left-egalitarian internationalists, but perhaps nothing in-between.

Comment →

Understanding Trump’s charisma offers important clues to understanding the problems that the Democrats need to address. Most important, the Democratic candidate must convey a sense that he or she will fulfil the promise of 2008: not piecemeal reform but a genuine, full-scale change in America’s way of thinking. It’s also crucial to recognise that, like Britain, America is at a turning point and must go in one direction or another. Finally, the candidate must speak to Americans’ sense of self-respect linked to social justice and inclusion. While Weber’s analysis of charisma arose from the German situation, it has special relevance to the United States of America, the first mass democracy, whose Constitution invented the institution of the presidency as a recognition of the indispensable role that unique individuals play in history.

Comment →

[E]ven Fox didn’t tout Bartiromo’s big scoops on Trump’s legislative agenda, because 10 months into the Trump presidency, nobody is so foolish as to believe that him saying, “We’re doing a big infrastructure bill,” means that the Trump administration is, in fact, doing a big infrastructure bill. The president just mouths off at turns ignorantly and dishonestly, and nobody pays much attention to it unless he says something unusually inflammatory.On some level, it’s a little bit funny. On another level, Puerto Rico is still languishing in the dark without power (and in many cases without safe drinking water) with no end in sight. Trump is less popular at this point in his administration than any previous president despite a generally benign economic climate, and shows no sign of changing course. Perhaps it will all work out for the best, and someday we’ll look back and chuckle about the time when we had a president who didn’t know anything about anything that was happening and could never be counted on to make coherent, factual statements on any subject. But traditionally, we haven’t elected presidents like that — for what have always seemed like pretty good reasons — and the risks of compounding disaster are still very much out there.

Comment →
CK's WP Plugins


Extraordinary Comments

CK's WP Plugins