Romney: Believe in White America

Believe in America

The above ad, Mitt Romney’s first of the campaign, has mainly received attention for quoting 2008 presidential candidate Obama deceptively.  In my view that particular kerfuffle has been overblown, while other much more disturbing aspects of the ad have received much less attention, at least so far.

I think the problem is that ads like these work on multiple logical and aesthetic levels simultaneously, but are received mainly with a certain set of assumptions, chiefly that voters in general are a mass of uninformed dullards who only infrequently can be raised to any level of interest at all.  So, in regard to the pseudo-quote, the thinking seems to go, some number of moronic swing voters might hear then-candidate Obama saying “if we talk about the economy, we lose” and process the words as “something Obama has said,” and care…The real function is to reinforce the idea that “the economy is Obama’s fault and Obama knows or should know it” -- in any event that it would be fair to hold him responsible.

The critics may be right that the ploy is underhanded and manipulative, but I’m not sure that it’s precisely a violation of the 9th Commandment, as Lawrence O’Donnell melodramatically insisted on TV last night. Rick Perry’s “Lazy” ad, which twisted innocuous remarks of the President’s into a “pathetic” attack on all Americans, was much more dishonest (not to mention typically stupid).

There’s another aspect of the Romney ad, however, that is much more striking to me.  It was pointed out by Democrat campaign professional Tad Devine, first on Twitter, then as quoted in The Hill today.  Talking heads, like The Hill‘s headline writers, will likely focus on a hotter but flimsier notion of Devine’s -- that Romney is specifically playing the Jeremiah Wright card -- but it’s not that Romney or his operatives are specifically seeking to “bring up Wright.”  They are openly bringing up what they think, and what they hope others think, Wright stood for.

What’s indelible in the ad is the presentation of two Americas:  A dreary African American America brought to power through the African American president, versus a (ca. 99%) White America everywhere associated with Mitt Romney.  Watch the ad:  The first half is the usual Montage of Lies and Misery (our opponent’s America), and the second half is the usual Ode to Truth and Joy (America under our guy).  As Devine points out, that first part includes a couple of shots that have no clear logical relationship to the main theme, but happen to depict African Americans -- walking through some unidentified public place, and in the pews of a church.  Then check the Ode to Joy scenes:  Romney backed by white people, close-ups on white people, groups of white workers, white, white, white.  Nearly invisible exceptions that prove the rule appear in the form of a couple of non-white people buried in the whiteout Romney-plus-crowd shot that appears as the video’s “splash” image, and in the form of one worker in one group scene who isn’t Caucasian.

At a certain point, it makes no difference whether the use of this contrast is intentional, though we can safely presume that every single cut and shot is exhaustively audited for messaging by Romney’s handsomely well-paid political media team.  To some extent, the result is simply what Romney is and what his campaign and his movement represent.

And, no, Herman Cain’s presence in the Republican field and his brief flirtation with near-credibility are not counterevidence.  We all know what and who Herman Cain is, what role he plays in this traditional race drama.  Because no one serious has ever taken his candidacy seriously, no one has had to spell it out explicitly.

Home Page  Public Email  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  Github   

Writing since ancient times, blogging, e-commercing, and site installing-designing-maintaining since 2001; WordPress theme and plugin configuring and developing since 2004 or so; a lifelong freelancer, not associated nor to be associated with any company, publication, party, university, church, or other institution.

9 comments on “Romney: Believe in White America

Commenting at CK MacLeod's

We are determined to encourage thoughtful discussion, so please be respectful to others. We also provide a set of Commenting Options - comment/commenter highlighting and ignoring, and commenter archives that you can access by clicking the commenter options button (). Go to our Commenting Guidelines page for more details, including how to report offensive and spam commenting.

  1. Milquetoast Mittens, and his Jiminy Cricket, Mike ‘Iceberg’ Murphy are incapable of any such nuance or subtext, then again that’s why Devine is former advisor to the Gore and Kerry campaigns, Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.

  2. Snarky monikers aside, the level of nuance and subtext Colin’s suggesting is merely that of a bright HS senior, or maybe even less biright or an earlier year. Colin’s interpetation registered on me in a non verbal way as sooon as I saw the commercial. Romney’s campaign expressed the idea that this ad “worked”. They don’t care about dems labeling tem dishonest. Big srprise, Romney’s dishonest. They wanted a free ride in it’s circulation and got it.

  3. They are that deep, the earlier images do echo the forced United Colors of Benetton iconography of the last campaign, the point being ‘were knee deep in the big muddy;

  4. Romney’s campaign needs a big win in New Hampshire and the ad is pitched to the audience …… if there are more than 11 black people likely to vote in a New Hampshire Republican primary…I’l be stuffed.

    • Sure, it’s pitched. But what kind of pitch is it? The whiteness of NH might explain the second half of the ad, but the first half is gratuitously non-white – scary urban black masses wanting to take your America away from you…

  5. It was quite a segue, but what happened to this place, when it used to be like the Modern British Army ‘where one could practice fine arts like macrame’ Can you believe that they remade the series for the web, although this time with the original
    post World War One timeline.

Commenter Ignore Button by CK's Plug-Ins

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



Noted & Quoted

TV pundits and op-ed writers of every major newspaper epitomize how the Democratic establishment has already reached a consensus: the 2020 nominee must be a centrist, a Joe Biden, Cory Booker or Kamala Harris–type, preferably. They say that Joe Biden should "run because [his] populist image fits the Democrats’ most successful political strategy of the past generation" (David Leonhardt, New York Times), and though Biden "would be far from an ideal president," he "looks most like the person who could beat Trump" (David Ignatius, Washington Post). Likewise, the same elite pundit class is working overtime to torpedo left-Democratic candidates like Sanders.

For someone who was not acquainted with Piketty's paper, the argument for a centrist Democrat might sound compelling. If the country has tilted to the right, should we elect a candidate closer to the middle than the fringe? If the electorate resembles a left-to-right line, and each voter has a bracketed range of acceptability in which they vote, this would make perfect sense. The only problem is that it doesn't work like that, as Piketty shows.

The reason is that nominating centrist Democrats who don't speak to class issues will result in a great swathe of voters simply not voting. Conversely, right-wing candidates who speak to class issues, but who do so by harnessing a false consciousness — i.e. blaming immigrants and minorities for capitalism's ills, rather than capitalists — will win those same voters who would have voted for a more class-conscious left candidate. Piketty calls this a "bifurcated" voting situation, meaning many voters will connect either with far-right xenophobic nationalists or left-egalitarian internationalists, but perhaps nothing in-between.

Comment →

Understanding Trump’s charisma offers important clues to understanding the problems that the Democrats need to address. Most important, the Democratic candidate must convey a sense that he or she will fulfil the promise of 2008: not piecemeal reform but a genuine, full-scale change in America’s way of thinking. It’s also crucial to recognise that, like Britain, America is at a turning point and must go in one direction or another. Finally, the candidate must speak to Americans’ sense of self-respect linked to social justice and inclusion. While Weber’s analysis of charisma arose from the German situation, it has special relevance to the United States of America, the first mass democracy, whose Constitution invented the institution of the presidency as a recognition of the indispensable role that unique individuals play in history.

Comment →

[E]ven Fox didn’t tout Bartiromo’s big scoops on Trump’s legislative agenda, because 10 months into the Trump presidency, nobody is so foolish as to believe that him saying, “We’re doing a big infrastructure bill,” means that the Trump administration is, in fact, doing a big infrastructure bill. The president just mouths off at turns ignorantly and dishonestly, and nobody pays much attention to it unless he says something unusually inflammatory.On some level, it’s a little bit funny. On another level, Puerto Rico is still languishing in the dark without power (and in many cases without safe drinking water) with no end in sight. Trump is less popular at this point in his administration than any previous president despite a generally benign economic climate, and shows no sign of changing course. Perhaps it will all work out for the best, and someday we’ll look back and chuckle about the time when we had a president who didn’t know anything about anything that was happening and could never be counted on to make coherent, factual statements on any subject. But traditionally, we haven’t elected presidents like that — for what have always seemed like pretty good reasons — and the risks of compounding disaster are still very much out there.

Comment →
CK's WP Plugins


Extraordinary Comments

CK's WP Plugins