Rooting for the Zombies

Noah Millman, who considers the “viral zombie” of The Walking Dead comix and TV series an “abomination,” embraces a traditional understanding of the genre and why it continues to appeal to us:

The group doesn’t inevitably and hopelessly succumb; instead, there’s the excitement of watching them (some of them) defeat and escape from the plague. Modern zombie movies are fantasies of election – we identify with the survivors, and so become convinced that we would be like them. And these survivors seem so much more alive than we do – partly because they’ve escaped the constraints of civilization, but not only because of that. Since zombies are death, that fantasy of election is a fantasy of escaping death entirely – precisely the opposite of what a zombie is supposed to make us feel.

This conventional view provides an opportunity to consider the alternative proposed by Evan Calder Williams in his book Combined and Uneven Apocalypse. Williams suggests that the zombies are the true protagonists of the genre:

[T]he on-the-surface social critique is the least interesting part of the films, particularly from a political perspective. If there is a sharper turn of critique and thought, one not caught in the abortive passage bound to the personal trauma, it can only lie in the zombies themselves, the real protagonists of the films. For not since Eisenstein’s films have we witnessed such a startling construction of the mass subject: the slow pained birth of the new group from the wreckage of the everyday.

Calder’s far left-inflected perspective evokes the ghost or dream image of revolution harkening all the way back to Jesus Christ, history’s greatest zombie-revolutionary, or perhaps to Spartacus: The zombie is an only slightly exaggerated version of the slave, “untouchable,” or other member of the lower orders from the perspective of the upper class. Like the hungry poor, the zombies confront the citizen as insatiably ravenous mouths to feed, the “unreasoning mob” itself, human as less than human, pure destructive appetite. At the same time, the terrifying joy of the zombie movie, like the terrifying joy both of other apocalyptic genres and of the slave revolt, lies in the destruction of one form of inhumanity by the other that it has produced, or that in the zombie scenario is produced from it directly. We witness or continually re-experience the liberating annihilation of the whole constricted, compromised, and evil world, all of its inequities, and all of its false values.

Millman’s point of departure was a friend’s question regarding some peculiar non-character characters of The Walking Dead‘s new season, two zombies with jaws and arms hacked off that the new character “Michonne” leads around by chains, possibly because they work as camouflage. We can first note their status as grotesquely perfect images of the speechless, powerless slaves, before turning to the question:  How, wonders Millman’s friend, do they survive without lower jaws, since they cannot feed? The question presumes that zombies feed for the same reason that normal animals do, when we have strong reason to believe that they bite and chew and claw reflexively, not to feed their stomachs. As Williams points out, the zombie is infinitely hungry, but does not really need to eat. In that sense, zombies are parodies equally of capitalist consumers compulsively pursuing absurd desires, as of the wretched of the Earth, whose feeding has no meaning because the lives that it preserves also seem to have no meaning.

We do not know how long the jaw-less zombies would last, just as there is much else about the zombie “life-cycle” (actually the life-cycle of the zombie virus) that is not explained, though under the Walking Dead scenario as under other typical zombie movie scenarios we are given to understand that there is or would be some scientific explanation for the goings-on. Such questions are pushed to the periphery of the zombie narrative, studiously unasked by the oddly incurious protagonists. Somewhat in the manner of traditional alien invasion or older vampire and werewolf movies, whose protagonists have somehow lived to adulthood or at least young adulthood without ever having seen an alien invasion, vampire, or werewolf movie, it is part of the zombie syndrome that the survivors rarely think very systematically and broadly about their situations. That sort of thing is left to zombie genre fans.

It might make The Walking Dead feel a lot less bleak if we had someone around to insist that the vast zombie population would run out of energy within a few months or years, leaving the survivors to inherit a cleansed and bounteous Earth and a merely manageable zombie difficulty. Yet if the scenario were less bleak, it would in a certain different sense also be less real and also less fantastically rewarding. It would be less true to the world as it really is, if not less true to the day to day experience of it for a citizen of a wealthy, advanced capitalist country, and it would be less true to the fantasy of that world’s overthrow. As Williams puts it, the real horror both for the zombie film and for the reality it inversively describes is “[n]ot the possibility of it ending this way, in plague and rot and terror, but instead, in the drawn out sigh of the thought, My god, what if it never ends…”

Since the viral zombie scenario also means that all of the living are really pre-zombies, whose waking and walking lives are likewise reduced to endless killing of the already dead and similar pointless motions, we can invert all of Millman’s premises, not to refute, but to complete them. No one gets out alive, no one escapes, just as in the world before the zombies. The excitement is not or certainly not merely in seeing who is going to make it, but in guessing who’s next to pass over and thus mark and however minimally validate the blurring border between different deaths-in-life… always looking forward to the total zombie victory.


WordPresser
Home Page  Public Email  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  Github   

Writing since ancient times, blogging, e-commercing, and site installing-designing-maintaining since 2001; WordPress theme and plugin configuring and developing since 2004 or so; a lifelong freelancer, not associated nor to be associated with any company, publication, party, university, church, or other institution.

3 comments on “Rooting for the Zombies

Commenting at CK MacLeod's

We are determined to encourage thoughtful discussion, so please be respectful to others. We also provide a set of Commenting Options - comment/commenter highlighting and ignoring, and commenter archives that you can access by clicking the commenter options button (). Go to our Commenting Guidelines page for more details, including how to report offensive and spam commenting.

  1. I like the Resident Evil version I know Umbrella is a precursor to Weyland/Yutani, but you might as well make it interesting,

  2. Great subject for a post. The post itself is wonderful, but the best thing is the cartoon. Zombie movies should be, one way or another, hilarious. They can be hilarious without being comical, but there’s nothing better than a comical zombie movie. One of my favorite movies of all time is “Shawn of the Dead.” Brilliant. “I just don’t think I have it in me to kill me flatmate, me mum, and me girlfriend all in the same night.” I also love Zombieland. It was a bit tweaky for me, though, because the main joke in the beginning of the movie was exactly the same as one I used in the Slider zombie episode. I did the rewrite for an episode credited to a free lance writer but the censors made me take out the line, “They became the first human happy-meals.” They said McDonald’s would sue. But they used the exact line in Zombieland and it great a huge laugh in the theater I was in. It was weird feeling. I thought, “I knew it.” I knew the line was great, and I should have just enjoyed the realization of the idea. But I was mad. I don’t even know why. There’s probably something zombie-ish about morning a dead joke that comes back to life when it should be dead but is funny and troubling at the same time.

1 Pings/Trackbacks for "Rooting for the Zombies"
  1. […] final zombie solution supports a certain theory of the political unconscious of the genre. As we have discussed, the zombie “holocaust” re-animates revolution and revelation as insurrection of the […]

Commenter Ignore Button by CK's Plug-Ins

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Related

Noted & Quoted

TV pundits and op-ed writers of every major newspaper epitomize how the Democratic establishment has already reached a consensus: the 2020 nominee must be a centrist, a Joe Biden, Cory Booker or Kamala Harris–type, preferably. They say that Joe Biden should "run because [his] populist image fits the Democrats’ most successful political strategy of the past generation" (David Leonhardt, New York Times), and though Biden "would be far from an ideal president," he "looks most like the person who could beat Trump" (David Ignatius, Washington Post). Likewise, the same elite pundit class is working overtime to torpedo left-Democratic candidates like Sanders.

For someone who was not acquainted with Piketty's paper, the argument for a centrist Democrat might sound compelling. If the country has tilted to the right, should we elect a candidate closer to the middle than the fringe? If the electorate resembles a left-to-right line, and each voter has a bracketed range of acceptability in which they vote, this would make perfect sense. The only problem is that it doesn't work like that, as Piketty shows.

The reason is that nominating centrist Democrats who don't speak to class issues will result in a great swathe of voters simply not voting. Conversely, right-wing candidates who speak to class issues, but who do so by harnessing a false consciousness — i.e. blaming immigrants and minorities for capitalism's ills, rather than capitalists — will win those same voters who would have voted for a more class-conscious left candidate. Piketty calls this a "bifurcated" voting situation, meaning many voters will connect either with far-right xenophobic nationalists or left-egalitarian internationalists, but perhaps nothing in-between.

Comment →

Understanding Trump’s charisma offers important clues to understanding the problems that the Democrats need to address. Most important, the Democratic candidate must convey a sense that he or she will fulfil the promise of 2008: not piecemeal reform but a genuine, full-scale change in America’s way of thinking. It’s also crucial to recognise that, like Britain, America is at a turning point and must go in one direction or another. Finally, the candidate must speak to Americans’ sense of self-respect linked to social justice and inclusion. While Weber’s analysis of charisma arose from the German situation, it has special relevance to the United States of America, the first mass democracy, whose Constitution invented the institution of the presidency as a recognition of the indispensable role that unique individuals play in history.

Comment →

[E]ven Fox didn’t tout Bartiromo’s big scoops on Trump’s legislative agenda, because 10 months into the Trump presidency, nobody is so foolish as to believe that him saying, “We’re doing a big infrastructure bill,” means that the Trump administration is, in fact, doing a big infrastructure bill. The president just mouths off at turns ignorantly and dishonestly, and nobody pays much attention to it unless he says something unusually inflammatory.On some level, it’s a little bit funny. On another level, Puerto Rico is still languishing in the dark without power (and in many cases without safe drinking water) with no end in sight. Trump is less popular at this point in his administration than any previous president despite a generally benign economic climate, and shows no sign of changing course. Perhaps it will all work out for the best, and someday we’ll look back and chuckle about the time when we had a president who didn’t know anything about anything that was happening and could never be counted on to make coherent, factual statements on any subject. But traditionally, we haven’t elected presidents like that — for what have always seemed like pretty good reasons — and the risks of compounding disaster are still very much out there.

Comment →
CK's WP Plugins

Categories

Extraordinary Comments

CK's WP Plugins