(taking up an e-mail conversation in mid-stream)
During the “knife fight,” Walt’s objective was clearly to gain control of the knife, not to stab Skyler. It was dangerous, for sure, but Skyler’s the one who introduced the knife, not Walt. She resorted to violence because Walt was not hearing her. Sure, Walt also indirectly endangered Holly by grabbing her, but it was not his intention to do so. From a purely pragmatic, though unrealistic if not insane narrow Walt-reasonable perspective, if Skyler and Flynn/Walt Jr. had run off with him, and brought Holly, too, they all would or might have been better off. That was also a fantasy for multiple but related reasons: It was morally and psychologically impossible for Skyler and Walt Jr., and the heat would have been too great for them to begin again somewhere else with new identities and $20 Million. He didn’t and couldn’t anticipate the consequences of his actions, which is the main theme of the show, that seemingly rational or “scientific” solutions to immediate problems turn into their opposites due to the complex interwovenness of real life or society: i.e., Crime Doesn’t Pay. Even when it seems to pay, even over-pay, it turns you into an unhappy monster, or someone who has “earned” millions of dollars for his family but is unable to put the money to use for them in any way. He can’t even find a way to get a fraction of it to them. They refuse and utterly repudiate his efforts: Thus Flynn/Walt Jr. in response to Walt, in the phone call that had Walt, for a second time, preparing to give in.
The ego project elements I mentioned weren’t about Jesse, but have to do with the couple being interviewed on Charlie Rose, happening to appear on TV in a flagrant violation of probabilities and believability, as sheer coincidence, interrupting Walt’s decision just to give up. The same plot element could have been introduced more believably, but such contrivances operate as the presence of the will of God (or the Devil – confrontation with the fatal choice) in Breaking Bad: In previous episodes, Walt has been driven to the edge of madness by the action of sheer coincidence – or synchronicity – which utterly confounds his scientific-rationalist worldview. The major plot point involving Walt’s negligent homicide of Jesse’s previous girlfriend involves another such playing out of horrific socialized consequences of a seemingly limited personal solution: It leads indirectly to the deaths of 167 people in an airliner collision (Wayfarer 515). You would have loved-hated Walt’s subsequent process of rationalization. I’ll have to find that episode and show it to you sometime.1
The murder of Jesse’s later ex-girlfriend was shocking. It’s also among other things the working out of Crime Doesn’t Pay in Jesse’s life, though also a consequence of the failure of his naively simple personal solution – betray Walt to Hank, not in the full spirit of justice or some Raskolnikovian confession and unburdening, but an attempt to use the law to serve his own personal ends as well. Hank also pays for the same error: Attempting to preserve his dignity, his own ego project, to be at least the man who brings Walt to justice, he rejects his wife’s advice to take the case to his colleagues. Hank produced other rationalizations for attempting to control events that were beyond him (as Walt tried to warn him), but his motives were clearly impure, and nothing less than 100% purity will do when you’re going up against Heisenberg (the principle as well as the man). Since no one is 100% pure, the world continually returns flawed and unexpected, fallen results for all of our real life lab experiments.
- Update: The episode I had in mind is “No Más,” in which Walt is asked to address a High School assembly on the subject of the airliner disaster in which, in a way known only to him, he has played a crucial role in causing. Underlining the link between coincidence and revelation, Walt mutters the words “Jesus H Christ” to himself before reluctantly taking the microphone, and proceeding to deliver a (for others demoralizingly, for us somewhat comically) scientific or scientistic response to the event, among other things by listing much worse disasters. [↩]