2014.02.18 – Unhappy Consciousness and True Detective (Title Sequence)

True Detective - Opening song (HD) (The Handsome Family - Far From Any Road)

The lyrics:

From the dusty May sun
Her looming shadow grows
Hidden in the branches of the poison creosote
She twines her spines up slowly
Towards the boiling sun
And when i touched her skin
My fingers ran with blood

In the hushing dusk under a swollen silver moon
I came walking with the wind to watch the cactus bloom
And strange hands halted me, the looming shadows danced
I fell down to the thorny brush and felt the trembling hands

When the last light warms the rocks
And the rattlesnakes unfold
Mountain cats will come to drag away your bones

And rise with me forever
Across the silent sand
And the stars will be your eyes
And the wind will be my hands

The song, “Far From Any Road,” is by “The Handsome Family,” from their 2003 album Singing Bones. Comes up since a tweep of a tweep, @NSlayton, noted the lack of any urban imagery or settings within the show, at least as it’s developed so far, or, to be more accurate, of any urban exteriors, since as far as we know one or more of the offices we see where police work is conducted are located in downtown Tulane or Baton Rouge or New Orleans, any of which may qualify as “urban” by reasonable standards…

According to the school of nihilism that our hero Rust Cohle explicates for us when we first meet him, humanity or human consciousness, human being itself, is an error or deformation. Death, from this perspective, is a correction, welcome if only because it puts an end to the painful and humiliating joke of life. The urban environment, sometimes called “the second environment,” is the human-made environment, and can reveal its own unique modes of (an)nihilation, but a television show that locates its “investigation” at a different vanishing point of the human has little use for crowded settings.

The title sequence repeatedly shows us the human form disturbingly where not grotesquely merged with landscapes, natural forms, and inanimate objects, like the murder victim whose case we are trying to solve…


…on the verge of re-integration, approaching, as a Decadent poet would put it, “the peace death brings.” Rust, whose name perhaps too obviously realizes the same motif, might agree with Ernest Dowson: “O pray the earth enfold/ Our life-sick hearts and turn them into dust!

Of course, Rust, even if he has been named for a chemical process of decay rather than for a living and human being, does not entirely or consistently “mean” any of it. A man who at another point could not say whether his mother was alive or dead, is now, by mid-season, clearly under suspicion of murder: He is like Camus’ Stranger, a suspect because of his (depraved) indifference, and at least guilty of demonstrating it in word and thought if not necessarily in action, but he is a troubled soul, a victim as well as an exponent of unhappy consciousness, and his enunciated position, like any notion of “meaning meaninglessness,” remains a contradictory (even if contradictorily self-reinforcing) position. He means to mean meaninglessness, or claims to, but he is a detective, a defender of civilization against even worse men, a promoter of justice, a protector of children (as we have seen clearly demonstrated). The belief in mistakenness will most likely turn out to be mistaken belief, as, it will turn out, we were not mistaken to think it was.

One possibility is therefore that Rust has been under cover trying to solve the crime (or gather evidence against a conspiracy) that he is on the verge of being blamed for, though such a revelation seems too neat to stand on its own. Still, however TV auteur Nick Pizzolato resolves the narrative, it is unlikely, even at this peculiar moment in American popular culture, that he will discover a way simply to sustain a message of messagelessness. Perhaps disappointingly, perhaps necessarily, TRUE DETECTIVE will likely end up having to mean or seem to mean, and seem to mean to mean, something, and not stand merely as an assertion of the impossibility or pointlessness of assertion -- the kind of statement credible enough, because comical, coming from a character in a Thomas Bernhard novel or in the theater of the absurd: the never believable claim, because destructive of any belief,  that it would be better on balance for our hero, for the story’s tortured victims, and for us, never to have lived at all. The Handsome Family’s solution “the stars will be your eyes/And the wind will be my hands,” if a solution at all, borrows meaning from the life it replicates or perhaps completes, not as a substitute for it.

Home Page  Public Email  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  Github   

Writing since ancient times, blogging, e-commercing, and site installing-designing-maintaining since 2001; WordPress theme and plugin configuring and developing since 2004 or so; a lifelong freelancer, not associated nor to be associated with any company, publication, party, university, church, or other institution. 

0 comments on “2014.02.18 – Unhappy Consciousness and True Detective (Title Sequence)

Commenting at CK MacLeod's

We are determined to encourage thoughtful discussion, so please be respectful to others. We also provide a set of Commenting Options - comment/commenter highlighting and ignoring, and commenter archives that you can access by clicking the commenter options button (). Go to our Commenting Guidelines page for more details, including how to report offensive and spam commenting.

    1 Pings/Trackbacks for "2014.02.18 – Unhappy Consciousness and True Detective (Title Sequence)"
    1. […] narrative results fulfilled natural expectations that a resolution of Rust Cohle’s character conflicts would all but certainly involve a […]

    Commenter Ignore Button by CK's Plug-Ins

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



    Noted & Quoted

    TV pundits and op-ed writers of every major newspaper epitomize how the Democratic establishment has already reached a consensus: the 2020 nominee must be a centrist, a Joe Biden, Cory Booker or Kamala Harris–type, preferably. They say that Joe Biden should "run because [his] populist image fits the Democrats’ most successful political strategy of the past generation" (David Leonhardt, New York Times), and though Biden "would be far from an ideal president," he "looks most like the person who could beat Trump" (David Ignatius, Washington Post). Likewise, the same elite pundit class is working overtime to torpedo left-Democratic candidates like Sanders.

    For someone who was not acquainted with Piketty's paper, the argument for a centrist Democrat might sound compelling. If the country has tilted to the right, should we elect a candidate closer to the middle than the fringe? If the electorate resembles a left-to-right line, and each voter has a bracketed range of acceptability in which they vote, this would make perfect sense. The only problem is that it doesn't work like that, as Piketty shows.

    The reason is that nominating centrist Democrats who don't speak to class issues will result in a great swathe of voters simply not voting. Conversely, right-wing candidates who speak to class issues, but who do so by harnessing a false consciousness — i.e. blaming immigrants and minorities for capitalism's ills, rather than capitalists — will win those same voters who would have voted for a more class-conscious left candidate. Piketty calls this a "bifurcated" voting situation, meaning many voters will connect either with far-right xenophobic nationalists or left-egalitarian internationalists, but perhaps nothing in-between.

    Comment →

    Understanding Trump’s charisma offers important clues to understanding the problems that the Democrats need to address. Most important, the Democratic candidate must convey a sense that he or she will fulfil the promise of 2008: not piecemeal reform but a genuine, full-scale change in America’s way of thinking. It’s also crucial to recognise that, like Britain, America is at a turning point and must go in one direction or another. Finally, the candidate must speak to Americans’ sense of self-respect linked to social justice and inclusion. While Weber’s analysis of charisma arose from the German situation, it has special relevance to the United States of America, the first mass democracy, whose Constitution invented the institution of the presidency as a recognition of the indispensable role that unique individuals play in history.

    Comment →

    [E]ven Fox didn’t tout Bartiromo’s big scoops on Trump’s legislative agenda, because 10 months into the Trump presidency, nobody is so foolish as to believe that him saying, “We’re doing a big infrastructure bill,” means that the Trump administration is, in fact, doing a big infrastructure bill. The president just mouths off at turns ignorantly and dishonestly, and nobody pays much attention to it unless he says something unusually inflammatory.On some level, it’s a little bit funny. On another level, Puerto Rico is still languishing in the dark without power (and in many cases without safe drinking water) with no end in sight. Trump is less popular at this point in his administration than any previous president despite a generally benign economic climate, and shows no sign of changing course. Perhaps it will all work out for the best, and someday we’ll look back and chuckle about the time when we had a president who didn’t know anything about anything that was happening and could never be counted on to make coherent, factual statements on any subject. But traditionally, we haven’t elected presidents like that — for what have always seemed like pretty good reasons — and the risks of compounding disaster are still very much out there.

    Comment →
    CK's WP Plugins


    Extraordinary Comments

    CK's WP Plugins