Mass Killing and State Concepts (Comment)

(Comment at Jay Ulfelder’s Dart-Throwing Chimp, “States Aren’t the Only Mass Killers.”)

To begin with what may seem like a trivial point, the “discrete group” killed on 9/11 may not be best described as “Americans.” The problem of defining Al Qaeda’s enemy also raises the question of whether we are in any sense obligated, for the sake of understanding if for no other reason, to consider the perpetrator’s definition or justification of acts that perhaps always entails the ambition to create or consolidate a “state” of some kind, even if not necessarily a modern political-administrative state. Far beyond Rwanda [cited as one of two cardinal examples of mass killing], examples of mass killing in addition to the Holocaust [the other example] have such a long and varied history they become difficult to distinguish from history, and for the same reason cover every type of state or state concept, including the state concepts that arise within or are implicit in resistance to imposition of other state concepts (via old and new species of imperialism, colonial expansion, “settlement” of territories not under recognized state governance, and so on). In the case of 9/11, the targets represented the financial, military, and political arms of an international (or imperial or neo-imperial) order centered in the United States that would have to be disrupted or reduced in order to advance the AQ state concept – the new Caliphate or expanding [super-]state of revolutionary Islamic states. The definitional problem may present inconveniences to the attempted reduction of history to the terms of contemporary social science, but, if by “state” we mean strictly political-administrative states capable of legal recognition within the current international system of states, then the creation of “non-state actors” as somewhat incomprehensible within that framework would be a predictable result. It also means that the further we look into the past, the less relevant and appropriate our categories will be. For example, was the settlement of North America, as accompanied by the mass annihilation of indigenous people and their ways of life over the course of centuries, accomplished by the American “state” or was the American state as we now know it a product among other things of the settlement of North America?

Home Page  Public Email  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  Github   

Writing since ancient times, blogging, e-commercing, and site installing-designing-maintaining since 2001; WordPress theme and plugin configuring and developing since 2004 or so; a lifelong freelancer, not associated nor to be associated with any company, publication, party, university, church, or other institution.

Commenter Ignore Button by CK's Plug-Ins

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



Noted & Quoted

[E]ven Fox didn’t tout Bartiromo’s big scoops on Trump’s legislative agenda, because 10 months into the Trump presidency, nobody is so foolish as to believe that him saying, “We’re doing a big infrastructure bill,” means that the Trump administration is, in fact, doing a big infrastructure bill. The president just mouths off at turns ignorantly and dishonestly, and nobody pays much attention to it unless he says something unusually inflammatory.On some level, it’s a little bit funny. On another level, Puerto Rico is still languishing in the dark without power (and in many cases without safe drinking water) with no end in sight. Trump is less popular at this point in his administration than any previous president despite a generally benign economic climate, and shows no sign of changing course. Perhaps it will all work out for the best, and someday we’ll look back and chuckle about the time when we had a president who didn’t know anything about anything that was happening and could never be counted on to make coherent, factual statements on any subject. But traditionally, we haven’t elected presidents like that — for what have always seemed like pretty good reasons — and the risks of compounding disaster are still very much out there.

Comment →

So, does Mitchell make any money on the work, which has been shared so many times? He uploaded a high-res image of the symbol and granted permission for anyone to use it personally for free. But for those who want to support his work or simply want something readymade, you can also buy T-shirts, sweatshirts, mugs, and journals emblazoned with the symbol through Threadless.“I really just want to spread the image as much as possible and cement it in history,” Mitchell says. “In all honesty, the amount I’ve made from my Threadless shop so far is still less than my hourly rate, so I don’t really see it as a big deal. If you look at my Twitter, half the replies are people wanting to know where they can buy a shirt. Threadless is happy to help them out with that, and so I’m happy to let that happen.”Now that the symbol has flooded our streets and our timelines, Mitchell just has one request: “Impeach this idiot already,” he says.

Comment →

This is a Waterloo moment for Trump, the tea party and their alliance. They have been stopped in their tracks not only by Democratic opposition but because of a mutiny within their own ranks. Although never particularly liked or respected, it is now clear that they are no longer feared. The bankruptcy of their ideas and their incompetence have been exposed. Their momentum has been dissipated. Their rejection of political norms has itself been scorned. Our long national nightmare may finally be coming to an end.

Comment →
CK's WP Plugins


Extraordinary Comments

CK's WP Plugins