Genres of the Genocidal

Tahar (@laseptiemewilay): Civilians are not that innocent. Children are just collateral. Now genocide. It is unsurprisingly the same argument expressed differently.

  1. @RexBrynen wiped from the inter-ether, I mean the post, not the victims of genocide in reply to RexBrynen 09:08:15, 2014-08-01
  2. RT @DawnHFoster: Hmm, Times of Israel have pulled down that horrendous ‘When Genocide is Permissible’ article. Here it is: 09:12:22, 2014-08-01
  3. He does not seem to understand what the word genocide means to the world. Ironic . 09:17:49, 2014-08-01
  4. He treats “genocide” as synonymous with non-applicability of conventions of warfare in pursuit of the obliteration of an unjust enemy. 09:24:37, 2014-08-01
  5. The “genus” or “gens” of “genocide” in common usage equates with a people, culture, “race” – he defines his target ambiguously. 09:32:13, 2014-08-01
  6. Doubly ironic that genocidalism is the basis of his call for [a consideration of] genocide – for extermination of all those who seek genocide 09:34:32, 2014-08-01
  7. cached version of article h/t @bungdan 09:40:02, 2014-08-01
  8. RT @bungdan: I’m trying to wrap my head around a Jewish newspaper publishing such a thing even for a few hours. It is not the world I grew up in. 09:40:53, 2014-08-01
  9. what the editors recognized only late is that the first question is “in what ways is discussion of genocide possibly permissible for us?” 09:45:10, 2014-08-01
  10. RT @JFXM: As @EylonALevy points out, @TimesofIsrael doesn’t edit/approve pieces before publication. System needs change if people justifying genocide. 09:49:53, 2014-08-01
  11. RT @badnetworker: Real talk: genocidal language isn’t rare in Israeli society. Not widely condoned (or necessarily meant seriously), but not unusual either. 09:53:53, 2014-08-01
  12. To reply to “when genocide is permissible” with snark or politics is also to normalize what we claim to define as un-normalizable. 09:58:21, 2014-08-01
  13. Just in case you thought Benny Morris might have been mellowing: h/t @NuisanceValue 10:33:07, 2014-08-01
  14. #pt hard to believe, w/o new 9/11s, the West can be convinced of the necessity of his program – he either needs or seeks a true “crisis” 10:41:42, 2014-08-01
  15. .@KevinNR with the “Palestinian Arabs have no necessary national claim” logic always struggling toward the surface 10:55:38, 2014-08-01
  16. RT @Yair_Rosenberg: OMG, Twitter is going to totally flip out when it sees who I found calling for genocide on the internet: 10:58:18, 2014-08-01
  17. Exterminate all exterminators without exception now or sooner. 10:59:42, 2014-08-01
  18. A Times of Israel blogger responds , but limits the range of the “wakeup call” @absilbers 12:20:13, 2014-08-01
  19. Apology from Yochanan Gordon 14:07:08, 2014-08-01

Home Page  Public Email  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  Github   

Writing since ancient times, blogging, e-commercing, and site installing-designing-maintaining since 2001; WordPress theme and plugin configuring and developing since 2004 or so; a lifelong freelancer, not associated nor to be associated with any company, publication, party, university, church, or other institution. 

0 comments on “Genres of the Genocidal

Commenting at CK MacLeod's

We are determined to encourage thoughtful discussion, so please be respectful to others. We also provide a set of Commenting Options - comment/commenter highlighting and ignoring, and commenter archives that you can access by clicking the commenter options button (). Go to our Commenting Guidelines page for more details, including how to report offensive and spam commenting.

    1 Pings/Trackbacks for "Genres of the Genocidal"
    1. […] thinking about genocide and the impermissible question of the permissibility of genocide, I have recently found myself running across the problem when intending to refer to types of hatred […]

    Commenter Ignore Button by CK's Plug-Ins

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



    Noted & Quoted

    TV pundits and op-ed writers of every major newspaper epitomize how the Democratic establishment has already reached a consensus: the 2020 nominee must be a centrist, a Joe Biden, Cory Booker or Kamala Harris–type, preferably. They say that Joe Biden should "run because [his] populist image fits the Democrats’ most successful political strategy of the past generation" (David Leonhardt, New York Times), and though Biden "would be far from an ideal president," he "looks most like the person who could beat Trump" (David Ignatius, Washington Post). Likewise, the same elite pundit class is working overtime to torpedo left-Democratic candidates like Sanders.

    For someone who was not acquainted with Piketty's paper, the argument for a centrist Democrat might sound compelling. If the country has tilted to the right, should we elect a candidate closer to the middle than the fringe? If the electorate resembles a left-to-right line, and each voter has a bracketed range of acceptability in which they vote, this would make perfect sense. The only problem is that it doesn't work like that, as Piketty shows.

    The reason is that nominating centrist Democrats who don't speak to class issues will result in a great swathe of voters simply not voting. Conversely, right-wing candidates who speak to class issues, but who do so by harnessing a false consciousness — i.e. blaming immigrants and minorities for capitalism's ills, rather than capitalists — will win those same voters who would have voted for a more class-conscious left candidate. Piketty calls this a "bifurcated" voting situation, meaning many voters will connect either with far-right xenophobic nationalists or left-egalitarian internationalists, but perhaps nothing in-between.

    Comment →

    Understanding Trump’s charisma offers important clues to understanding the problems that the Democrats need to address. Most important, the Democratic candidate must convey a sense that he or she will fulfil the promise of 2008: not piecemeal reform but a genuine, full-scale change in America’s way of thinking. It’s also crucial to recognise that, like Britain, America is at a turning point and must go in one direction or another. Finally, the candidate must speak to Americans’ sense of self-respect linked to social justice and inclusion. While Weber’s analysis of charisma arose from the German situation, it has special relevance to the United States of America, the first mass democracy, whose Constitution invented the institution of the presidency as a recognition of the indispensable role that unique individuals play in history.

    Comment →

    [E]ven Fox didn’t tout Bartiromo’s big scoops on Trump’s legislative agenda, because 10 months into the Trump presidency, nobody is so foolish as to believe that him saying, “We’re doing a big infrastructure bill,” means that the Trump administration is, in fact, doing a big infrastructure bill. The president just mouths off at turns ignorantly and dishonestly, and nobody pays much attention to it unless he says something unusually inflammatory.On some level, it’s a little bit funny. On another level, Puerto Rico is still languishing in the dark without power (and in many cases without safe drinking water) with no end in sight. Trump is less popular at this point in his administration than any previous president despite a generally benign economic climate, and shows no sign of changing course. Perhaps it will all work out for the best, and someday we’ll look back and chuckle about the time when we had a president who didn’t know anything about anything that was happening and could never be counted on to make coherent, factual statements on any subject. But traditionally, we haven’t elected presidents like that — for what have always seemed like pretty good reasons — and the risks of compounding disaster are still very much out there.

    Comment →
    CK's WP Plugins


    Extraordinary Comments

    CK's WP Plugins