Yes, sometimes comment sections contain insight and reasoned discussion. But do you really want to take that chance?
The tweet was originally submitted on September 9, and re-tweeted yesterday, September 20, by Cathy Young (@CathyYoung63, an interesting writer and excellent “follow”). The more I look at it, the less well I understand it.
My initial impression was that @AvoidComments meant that the occasional encounter with “insight” cannot compensate for dealing with all the rest of the typical internet comment section, but I now wonder if the more obvious or simply correct reading is the perverse one, something like “yet another reason to ‘avoid comments’ is the danger of encounters with insight and reason.” This warning would serve, I guess, for those people who do not find the usual pathologies of “the comments” repellent, who prefer to remain insulated from insight and reason, yet who might, in the general interest of the campaign against comments sections, be dissuaded from participation on this narrow basis. If the idea is to improve comments sections rather than simply to attack all who participate in them, then, if taken in this last sense, the tweet might be seen as a satirical gesture, uttered as though to discourage the determinedly dim and the committedly unreasonable from showing up – “Warning: Thoughtful and Friendly Exchanges” – but really meant to mock them, from the point of view of “responsible commenters.” If so, the tweet would be the first sign I’ve seen anywhere of a positive intention or idea from the “DRC”-ists.
Another possibility would be that the tweet was tweeted or re-tweeted as an interestingly complicated absurdity – the last part of the tweet merely to be absorbed as reversal of expectations and dispensed with, no harm done, nothing else either sought or achieved. Or maybe the tweet was just garbled, or not intended to be read very attentively, and my initial reading was correct or close enough.
Any ideas? I promise to read your comments, if any, as I always do. Also, to be clear, though I understand that DRCers have mostly “big” sites in mind, not blogs that take their comment threads and commenters seriously, I’m still not a fan of the DRC theme, as I’ve indicated before both on this blog and on Twitter.