The Decline of Political-Cultural Blogging in One Page

2014-11-23_OT_BLOGROLLAs I already noted in an exchange here with “Ordinary Times” contributor Vikram Bath, a “blogroll” used to represent a circle or network of intercommunicating, mutually encouraging bloggers and blog-communities. Getting a spot on a popular blog’s roll was once a top goal for aspiring bloggers.

The first thing to note about OT’s blogroll is that, though it has been moved off the blog’s front page and sidebars, it still occupies a prominent link-position in the main menu. The second thing to note about it is that it isn’t: The blogroll page’s blogroll is missing. The only blogs that the “Blogroll” page rolls are OT’s nine “Internal Blogs,” which already have their own separate main menu spot, with associated dropdown links. If, however, you click on “Blogs” rather than on one of the individual dropdowns, you’ll be taken to a page that is empty except for a three-month old piece of “comment spam.” Back on the Blogroll page, where the Internal Blogs are actually listed, there also used to be or clearly was intended to be something like a normal blogroll, probably listing tens of friendly blogs, but there is now only what clearly appears to be a piece of dysfunctional WordPress “shortcode” – [collroll] – from the obsolete but rather serendipitously named plug-in “Collapsing Blogroll.”

I’m tempted to leave this discussion right here, since the failure of this shortcode is itself like a piece of shortcode that any thoughtful observer ought to be able to expand into a larger critique: That the OT blogroll has consisted of [collroll] and nothing but [collroll] for many months now, and that either no one has pointed it out or whoever is responsible does not care or does not know how to fix it may say quite a bit about OT’s progressive disconnection from the rest of the blog-world, or from what we used to call the “blogosphere.” (I always imagine the word being pronounced by Ariana Huffington.) That OT, when it was the LOOG, was a somewhat prominent or major-minor independent blog may in turn say something about the decline of blogs of its type.

The rest of the content of the Blogroll page, other than some (more) comment-spam (three years old rather than just three months), describes OT’s own sphere, as represented in that somewhat redundant list of “Internal Blogs,” which, like the non-collapsed or not yet collapsed but clearly collapsing blogrolls of many still popular or still barely hanging-on blogs, is full of zombies. “The 49th” last put up a post in October of this year, so around a month ago, before that in July: Even at that very low rate of publication, it qualifies as about average for the nine, as does “Blinded Trials.” The most recent posts at Blinded Trials are, however, by an author, Christopher Carr, who is not credited on the Blogroll page as a blog author. Of the two listed “principal authors,” Russell Saunders still offers posts from time to time, but Rose Woodhouse has not posted in months. “Dutch Courage” has not posted since June. “Healthy Commotion” has posted twice since May, while the vast majority of its content, all of it for more than a year, has been provided by Ethan Gach, another author not credited. “Journeys in Alterity” has not been updated since September, when it featured a post announcing that one of its two authors, Kyle Cupp, would be journeying elsewhere. The other named “Journeys” author, Elizabeth Stoker, has not published a post at OT in almost a year: She was welcomed into the fold in December of 2013, and has not made a contribution since January of 2014. “Mindless Diversions” and “Not a Potted Plant” (where Mr. Bath posts) qualify as unusually lifelike: They publish fairly frequently, especially Mindless Diversions. “Ordinary Tales” and “Ordinary University” fit the comatose or zombified norm.

Numerous problems like the ones on OT’s Blogroll page have been obvious at the site for several months, at least to anyone who might care to look. As I also mentioned to Bath, I have directly contacted an editor at the site with my observations, and I also have used the site’s contact form for the purpose (several weeks ago). I even volunteered to implement the mostly simple fixes myself. At this point, no one ought to be surprised to learn that I have thusfar received no reply to any of these messages.

Home Page  Public Email  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  Github   

Writing since ancient times, blogging, e-commercing, and site installing-designing-maintaining since 2001; WordPress theme and plugin configuring and developing since 2004 or so; a lifelong freelancer, not associated nor to be associated with any company, publication, party, university, church, or other institution. 

9 comments on “The Decline of Political-Cultural Blogging in One Page

Commenting at CK MacLeod's

We are determined to encourage thoughtful discussion, so please be respectful to others. We also provide a set of Commenting Options - comment/commenter highlighting and ignoring, and commenter archives that you can access by clicking the commenter options button (). Go to our Commenting Guidelines page for more details, including how to report offensive and spam commenting.

  1. everything you note here is correct. Well everything safe one. I thought that we had reached out to you, either in late October or early November.  did we not?


    in either case, I would very much like your assistance. Assuming that it still being offered, of course.

    • Hi RTK – ain’t got no record of no reaching out. If I’d been reached, I’d for sure not have written this post! Who would’ve reached, under what heading, and by what means? (If it was an email that happened to use “Open Enrollment” or “mobile TV” in the subject line, it would have gone into the spam queue.)

    • Anyway, one place to begin would be the email I sent you via the contact form. I made a copy:

      Browsing around the site yesterday, I noticed a number of formatting and display errors. I get the impression you don’t have anyone willing and able to keep the site updated, but these are simple problems that mostly would not require any great expertise to solve. If no one else will or can do what needs and ought to be done, I would be willing to do it for you during the spare time I don’t have.

      1. The Twitter widget is dysfunctional in Firefox and Chrome, though displays well on Safari. Probably should be replaced with Twitter’s own widget if it cannot be easily updated.

      2. The blogroll page does not have a blogroll. Instead, it shows a piece of shortcode, likely for a plug-in that is no longer functioning. Either the plug-in needs to be updated or different one used in its place. (I’m guessing that the blogroll itself is full of dead or senescent blogs, but updating it, assuming you want to have one at all, is a different problem that would be more time-consuming to address.)

      3. Guest Posting Policy has a broken link to a missing image at the top. Obviously, it should be restored or the code should be deleted.

      4. Same for Commenting Policy

      5. On mobile devices the Site Header Image (bicycle/Ordinary Times) is displaced offscreen – about 50% on my Android phone, for example. Fix: probably one line of code, maybe a handful.

      I’ll refrain from a full critique of site aesthetics or further suggestions, except to mention two other very simple changes that would make the site more readable: It’s very easy to add author by-lines or other “metadata” (like number of comments, and direct link to threads) to your front page template. It’s also easy – or not hard! – to format comments so that they’re more readable on small screens (not squozen into narrow columns), but remain unchanged on desktop displays.

      Of course, it may be that you like things just as they are. If so, carry on!


      • Apologies if we did not reach out, especially since we made a collective decision to do so.

        Apologies as well that I do not see that we received your message via the contact form.

        And yes, each of those statements is indeed indicative of larger problems.

        But now here we are, so I guess I’ll just ask you: What kind of assistance is it that you would be willing to offer? If these comments are the extent, then I’ll copy and bring back to our group with my thanks.  Really, I do appreciate it and we can find ways, I think, to have these observations be difference makers.

        On the other hand, if you’d like to do something more partner-esque, I think your help would be amazing for our site.

  2. I don’t know how far I’d extend the lessons from that page. I agree that it doesn’t seem like a terribly useful way to access content, whether it is on the site or elsewhere. I think I’ve heard some people mention having a real blogroll with links to other places, but that would involve coming up with a list of places, and that would be…work, especially because there would probably be some need to set up a process for agreeing who should be on there and how to keep it updated.

    I know you don’t mention it, but I’d critique myself as somewhat embodying that page in how I comment on the internet in general. I generally lurk everywhere except OT (not counting this). I think when I used to blog for another site long ago, that I interacted more with others, both as a commenter and with linking to them within my own posts. At OT, I think I probably link more to other people’s work, but a lot of it happens to be other writers at OT.

    In other words, I’m interacting with a greater number of people, but many of them tend to blog at the same place I do.

    >no reply to any of these messages

    I have to confess to not knowing anything about that. Working on making the site better is desirable, but it’s not exactly easy to get changes implemented. Even if someone is willing to help for free, there might be coordination issues that make it harder. (I’m typing with my ass here. I really don’t know, but I get the impression it’s not all that easy.)

    • Now that we’ve gotten the attention of Rtod, we’ll see how it goes, but OT suffers from absentee sitelord syndrome, which’s why it’s so hard to get the radiator fixed or the hedges trimmed, or why saving it, if possible at all, might require a revolt or takeover – or mass exodus. On the other hand, many sites whose founders or key bloggers are still active on site are also very poorly kept up, so it’s not just a governance problem.


1 Pings/Trackbacks for "The Decline of Political-Cultural Blogging in One Page"
  1. […] the same discussion thread, bob supplies a previously written, more expansive definition of the […]

Commenter Ignore Button by CK's Plug-Ins

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



Noted & Quoted

TV pundits and op-ed writers of every major newspaper epitomize how the Democratic establishment has already reached a consensus: the 2020 nominee must be a centrist, a Joe Biden, Cory Booker or Kamala Harris–type, preferably. They say that Joe Biden should "run because [his] populist image fits the Democrats’ most successful political strategy of the past generation" (David Leonhardt, New York Times), and though Biden "would be far from an ideal president," he "looks most like the person who could beat Trump" (David Ignatius, Washington Post). Likewise, the same elite pundit class is working overtime to torpedo left-Democratic candidates like Sanders.

For someone who was not acquainted with Piketty's paper, the argument for a centrist Democrat might sound compelling. If the country has tilted to the right, should we elect a candidate closer to the middle than the fringe? If the electorate resembles a left-to-right line, and each voter has a bracketed range of acceptability in which they vote, this would make perfect sense. The only problem is that it doesn't work like that, as Piketty shows.

The reason is that nominating centrist Democrats who don't speak to class issues will result in a great swathe of voters simply not voting. Conversely, right-wing candidates who speak to class issues, but who do so by harnessing a false consciousness — i.e. blaming immigrants and minorities for capitalism's ills, rather than capitalists — will win those same voters who would have voted for a more class-conscious left candidate. Piketty calls this a "bifurcated" voting situation, meaning many voters will connect either with far-right xenophobic nationalists or left-egalitarian internationalists, but perhaps nothing in-between.

Comment →

Understanding Trump’s charisma offers important clues to understanding the problems that the Democrats need to address. Most important, the Democratic candidate must convey a sense that he or she will fulfil the promise of 2008: not piecemeal reform but a genuine, full-scale change in America’s way of thinking. It’s also crucial to recognise that, like Britain, America is at a turning point and must go in one direction or another. Finally, the candidate must speak to Americans’ sense of self-respect linked to social justice and inclusion. While Weber’s analysis of charisma arose from the German situation, it has special relevance to the United States of America, the first mass democracy, whose Constitution invented the institution of the presidency as a recognition of the indispensable role that unique individuals play in history.

Comment →

[E]ven Fox didn’t tout Bartiromo’s big scoops on Trump’s legislative agenda, because 10 months into the Trump presidency, nobody is so foolish as to believe that him saying, “We’re doing a big infrastructure bill,” means that the Trump administration is, in fact, doing a big infrastructure bill. The president just mouths off at turns ignorantly and dishonestly, and nobody pays much attention to it unless he says something unusually inflammatory.On some level, it’s a little bit funny. On another level, Puerto Rico is still languishing in the dark without power (and in many cases without safe drinking water) with no end in sight. Trump is less popular at this point in his administration than any previous president despite a generally benign economic climate, and shows no sign of changing course. Perhaps it will all work out for the best, and someday we’ll look back and chuckle about the time when we had a president who didn’t know anything about anything that was happening and could never be counted on to make coherent, factual statements on any subject. But traditionally, we haven’t elected presidents like that — for what have always seemed like pretty good reasons — and the risks of compounding disaster are still very much out there.

Comment →
CK's WP Plugins


Extraordinary Comments

CK's WP Plugins