Patronize ‘Em: WordPress Draft Post Docket with Subscription and Donation Options

2015-06-05 page_docket

“In Progress” Page with 10 Draft Posts

Core functions completed and ready for testing, bells, whistles, plug-innability, and code presentation still to come: A notification-enabled “Coming Soon” or “Works in Progress” or “Docket” feature. This post will provide for initial on-line testing of the full functional cycle – display, subscription, confirmation, co-messaging, subscription cancellation, notification, removal of used subscription data.

CONCEPT

I had several interrelated purposes in mind when I envisioned the Docket. First, and easiest to implement, I wanted to show users what a writer happened to be working on. I put up a Docket of that type last December, showing five draft posts in the sidebar, ten on a dedicated page, in order of most recently modified, unwanted post types excluded. (I didn’t have the time to go much further with it: It was just a non-interactive archive.)

Second, I wanted users to be able to subscribe to be notified when posts they selected were published: A convenience for a certain type of specifically interested reader. Whether or not users subscribed to the particular post – rather than or in addition to subscribing to all new posts or in some alternative actual or potential modality (category subscriptions, RSS subscriptions, newsletter/digest subscriptions, and so on) – the feature might still serve the same promotional and even self-motivational purposes provided by the December Docket.

Third, and to me at least as important, since subscriptions to a particular not-yet-published post would provide incentives to the writer to finish his or her work, the existence of the option would give the user a chance to join in the writing-publication process, or even, fourth, play internet patron of the literary arts via associated fundraising and acknowledgement options.

ON-LINE IMPLEMENTATION

If I get any cooperation, some post on the current list – ten choices on the docket page, presented in a random chunk of three in the sidebar – will get published in effect on user request, possibly earlier than if I had waited until the spirit finally moved me, assuming it ever did.

Sidebar Widget Set to "3"

Sidebar Docket Widget Set to “3”

I’m not in a hurry. Most the posts on the list are “Untimely Posts” – as I defined the category,”usually begun in the heat of some ongoing controversy, withheld until memories have mostly faded and tempers mostly cooled”:  No great harm in holding out for a while longer to see if any users do me the honor of helping test the feature. By subscribing they – or you – will also identify a post or posts “on deck” likely to get an interested reading from someone – or at least that’s how I’ll take the fact.

I’m fairly confident that the main process works, but during the initial phase it might also be helpful if you let me know directly – maybe in the comments below – that you have subscribed. Please feel free to give any feedback on aesthetics or confusion or unexpected behavior, too!

Of course, the way these things work, even assuming some friends of the blog or lurkers or regulars do help out, they will subscribe to the posts on the list that I would in fact be least likely to have published next, the posts in my judgment furthest from being “done” or riskiest for my reputation either because likely to be misunderstood or, worse, because likely to be correctly understood.

So be it. I still want to see which if any particular posts attract interest or especially interesting interest. If no one subscribes, I can, of course, still test and re-test the feature with my own email addresses, so I’ll still be able to move forward, but, at least as far as substantive posts go – long-form posts or posts in series other than on web design or some other directly career-related or other practical topic – you can consider me on a “writer’s strike” until at least one of you all subscribes.

I may make that a general policy: No subscriptions, no “real” posts. Of course, if you like the site the way it is – no long posts, mostly web design posts, occasional notes posts, Twitter feed – then you don’t have to do anything, or you can donate with a message to please shut up for good!

If the weight of opinion falls on that last alternative, I suppose I may comply, and some future executor, if any, of my future estate, if any, will have to decide whether or not the backlog of never-subscribed-to posts is of sufficient interest to merit distribution of any kind.

For now, fingers crossed, I should be hitting the ol’ “Publish” button any moment now. I have already been notified at least of my subscription to this post, and I look forward, if all goes to well, to the satisfaction of my own curiosity.


WordPresser
Home Page  Public Email  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  Github   

Writing since ancient times, blogging, e-commercing, and site installing-designing-maintaining since 2001; WordPress theme and plugin configuring and developing since 2004 or so; a lifelong freelancer, not associated nor to be associated with any company, publication, party, university, church, or other institution.

Posts in this series

3 comments on “Patronize ‘Em: WordPress Draft Post Docket with Subscription and Donation Options

Commenting at CK MacLeod's

We are determined to encourage thoughtful discussion, so please be respectful to others. We also provide a set of Commenting Options - comment/commenter highlighting and ignoring, and commenter archives that you can access by clicking the commenter options button (). Go to our Commenting Guidelines page for more details, including how to report offensive and spam commenting.

  1. This seems kinda Borges-ian in concept, altho it may produce interesting results – at times directing you to write about things you’ve lost interest in, and either regained it at the prompting of readers, or perhaps looing even more interest.

    • Thanks for playing, bob. I hadn’t thought of the concept as Borgesian.

      It’s in the writer’s control to determine which draft posts end up on the list. So, if I’m sure I don’t want anyone to ask me to work up some old post defending Sarah Palin’s reputation or taking a stand against puppies, I can keep it off the display. Currently, I have it set at all most recently modified posts not in the “notes” category, but I could apply more refined sorting, or set up a special category just for subscribable drafts.

      Involvement of the reader, or the reader’s “patronization,” is intended as a key feature though. I’ll eventually add a capacity to show number of subscriptions – so that at a busier site than this one we could even introduce a bit of mass competition to show support or among multiple writers to get it. (Yes, could have downside, too, if misused.)

    • Have now added a subscribers count on the docket page, since we now have another player. No readerly consensus yet, but it’s early days.

      I DID take a look at the post you subscribed to, did a round of edits, still reconnoitering.

Commenter Ignore Button by CK's Plug-Ins

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Related

Noted & Quoted

TV pundits and op-ed writers of every major newspaper epitomize how the Democratic establishment has already reached a consensus: the 2020 nominee must be a centrist, a Joe Biden, Cory Booker or Kamala Harris–type, preferably. They say that Joe Biden should "run because [his] populist image fits the Democrats’ most successful political strategy of the past generation" (David Leonhardt, New York Times), and though Biden "would be far from an ideal president," he "looks most like the person who could beat Trump" (David Ignatius, Washington Post). Likewise, the same elite pundit class is working overtime to torpedo left-Democratic candidates like Sanders.

For someone who was not acquainted with Piketty's paper, the argument for a centrist Democrat might sound compelling. If the country has tilted to the right, should we elect a candidate closer to the middle than the fringe? If the electorate resembles a left-to-right line, and each voter has a bracketed range of acceptability in which they vote, this would make perfect sense. The only problem is that it doesn't work like that, as Piketty shows.

The reason is that nominating centrist Democrats who don't speak to class issues will result in a great swathe of voters simply not voting. Conversely, right-wing candidates who speak to class issues, but who do so by harnessing a false consciousness — i.e. blaming immigrants and minorities for capitalism's ills, rather than capitalists — will win those same voters who would have voted for a more class-conscious left candidate. Piketty calls this a "bifurcated" voting situation, meaning many voters will connect either with far-right xenophobic nationalists or left-egalitarian internationalists, but perhaps nothing in-between.

Comment →

Understanding Trump’s charisma offers important clues to understanding the problems that the Democrats need to address. Most important, the Democratic candidate must convey a sense that he or she will fulfil the promise of 2008: not piecemeal reform but a genuine, full-scale change in America’s way of thinking. It’s also crucial to recognise that, like Britain, America is at a turning point and must go in one direction or another. Finally, the candidate must speak to Americans’ sense of self-respect linked to social justice and inclusion. While Weber’s analysis of charisma arose from the German situation, it has special relevance to the United States of America, the first mass democracy, whose Constitution invented the institution of the presidency as a recognition of the indispensable role that unique individuals play in history.

Comment →

[E]ven Fox didn’t tout Bartiromo’s big scoops on Trump’s legislative agenda, because 10 months into the Trump presidency, nobody is so foolish as to believe that him saying, “We’re doing a big infrastructure bill,” means that the Trump administration is, in fact, doing a big infrastructure bill. The president just mouths off at turns ignorantly and dishonestly, and nobody pays much attention to it unless he says something unusually inflammatory.On some level, it’s a little bit funny. On another level, Puerto Rico is still languishing in the dark without power (and in many cases without safe drinking water) with no end in sight. Trump is less popular at this point in his administration than any previous president despite a generally benign economic climate, and shows no sign of changing course. Perhaps it will all work out for the best, and someday we’ll look back and chuckle about the time when we had a president who didn’t know anything about anything that was happening and could never be counted on to make coherent, factual statements on any subject. But traditionally, we haven’t elected presidents like that — for what have always seemed like pretty good reasons — and the risks of compounding disaster are still very much out there.

Comment →
CK's WP Plugins

Categories

Extraordinary Comments

CK's WP Plugins