Output-Buffering and Extensible WordPress Plug-Ins

Contrary to my tentative conclusions of a month ago, I now understand at least one good reason to use output-buffering while writing WordPress code. Indeed, I now anticipate using the tool frequently.

While asking a question to developers at StackOverflow, I wrote the following:

My general impression is that, unless I have a very good reason for using it – probably involving the kind of script in which I’m not generally interested at this time – I should avoid it. Yet I’ll read suggestions that I could use buffering in one or another normal context (e.g., a shortcode that renders a large block of HTML), and I often see it being used in code by people whose work I admire and try to emulate. I’ve seen the familiar ob_start() etc. sequences applied for rendering even very minimal output that is not further adjusted: a menu or other short list, for example.

I have also seen people assert that there is simply no need for output buffering in well-written code, except in peculiar situations… Others will say it’s useful ONLY when some manipulation of the output is necessary – like a preg_replace of content – but you don’t need an output buffer to do that kind of thing (any ol’ variable will do).

The minimal response I received tended toward agreement: “I have no idea,” said one developer, “why some people would forcedly output something instead of returning it as a string, especially as for libraries.” My thinking was not completely wrong, but the exception I mentioned and which the developer mentions – concerning “manipulation of the output” or “forced output” – turns out to be more common in WordPress than I recognized.

The use has to do with establishing code extensibility. As WordPresser Pippin Williamson put it in a useful post from 2012, making a WordPress plugin extensible means writing it so that “other plugins and themes can manipulate or add onto the behavior of the plugin.” The “WordPress way” to achieve this end is to include “action hooks” and “filters” at critical points. It turns out that for the kind of script in which I am interested, the ob_start() to ob_get_clean() sequence is just what I need.

In my own StackOverflow answer  to my own question, posted today, I wrote the following:

In order to provide a filter – using the common WordPress “apply_filters” function – you will frequently need to be able to capture the entirety of your HTML output at once. When creating a large, complex block with mixed HTML and secondary functions, using an ob_start()/ob_get_[] sequence will be a markedly more efficient way of achieving this end.

So: A plugin on which I’m currently working outputs a table whose elements are put together using a number of secondary functions. Now, I could conceivable do the entire thing adding content to a single variable, but it’s much easier and more economical to initiate output buffering at the beginning, and then write the code without the extra layer of abstraction of $html .= [more and more HTML and PHP] In the end, the code assigns the entire output to a variable:

$html = ob_get_clean();

It then returns the variable with the apply_filters function:

return apply_filters( 'filter-tag' , $html );

Additionally, ob_start() and ob_get_clean() mark points in the code where it makes sense to provide do_action hooks.

In the Link-Posts Aggregator plug-in that I’ve been working on for the last month or two, at line 150 (as of this writing) of the main output function, the code finally turns to the main WordPress query that will produce the actual content of the table. In a sequence that I’m thinking may become a common sight in my plug-ins of this general type, lines 152-6 read as follows:

After 86 lines, including action by 4 html-outputting secondary functions, the query loop has finished, and the total output can now be captured – and hook-and-filtered:

Now I – or any developer – can add functions at the “do_action” points, or can perform more complex manipulation of the “$html” content.

How to use apply_filters is something that has taken me a long time to grasp: I wish I had come across Williamson’s post when first seeing the function in WordPress core code (years ago by now), and having no idea how to exploit it!


WordPresser
Home Page  Public Email  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  Github   

Writing since ancient times, blogging, e-commercing, and site installing-designing-maintaining since 2001; WordPress theme and plugin configuring and developing since 2004 or so; a lifelong freelancer, not associated nor to be associated with any company, publication, party, university, church, or other institution. 

Posts in this series

Commenter Ignore Button by CK's Plug-Ins

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

WordPress Plug-In Notes

  1. Realizing the Commentariat (May 8, 2015)
  2. Child of Mog; Extraordinary Comments (May 25, 2015)
  3. Patronize 'Em: WordPress Draft Post Docket with Subscription and Donation Options (June 9, 2015)
  4. Realizing The Commentariat: Phase 2 (June 22, 2015)
  5. Pseudo-Redacting Spoilerer (July 25, 2015)
  6. Spoiling you some more (August 5, 2015)
  7. Testing Ajaxified Comments - Experiment Halted (August 11, 2015)
  8. New New Since Last Visit Comments Comments (August 16, 2015)
  9. WordPress Comment Nesting Unbound (August 22, 2015)
  10. The Snake Is Implemented (August 25, 2015)
  11. Comments Since Last Visit Reloaded, Reloaded, Testing Post (August 31, 2015)
  12. Comments Since Last Visit, Reloaded, Augmented, Installed, In Two Steps (September 13, 2015)
  13. Coming Soon (I Think!): Author Bios (September 25, 2015)
  14. How to Do Backlinking Footnotes (November 30, 2015)
  15. Who or What Is Using "Commenter Archive" and "commenter-thread"? (February 16, 2016)
  16. Enabling WordPress Press This for HostGator Sites (March 9, 2016)
  17. Linkback Your Xpost: A Simple WordPress Filter Function (March 14, 2016)
  18. Add Amazon Affiliate Tags to WordPress Posts <i>and</i> Comments Automatically (March 19, 2016)
  19. Finding Lost WordPress Widgets after Core Upgrade (March 21, 2016)
  20. Plug-In Away... and the Iron Law of Irony (April 16, 2016)
  21. To o-b or not to o-b (output-buffering in WordPress) - UPDATED (April 24, 2016)
  22. Output-Buffering and Extensible WordPress Plug-Ins (May 21, 2016)
  23. Getting Right with Image Rights: WP Replace Unlicensed and Broken Images Plug-In (June 17, 2016)
  24. Getting Right with Image Rights: Workflow and Major Minor Upgrade (June 27, 2016)
  25. Getting to Better WordPress Twitter oEmbed (June 28, 2016)
  26. An Alliance of Digital Artists (Art and Work in the Age of Instant Reproducibility) (July 8, 2016)
  27. Comparative Page Loads with and without Image Errors (July 14, 2016)
  28. jQuery-Filling an Input Box in WordPress Admin (July 15, 2016)
  29. Drilling a Hole in the Universe with WP_Query in a Shortcode (September 1, 2016)
  30. Troll-Stomping and Other Sensible Things: #WordPress Plug-In Beta Test/Preview (November 12, 2016)
  31. Commenter Ignore Button Preview Video (November 30, 2016)
  32. Is This Solution for Caches vs Cookies Going to Get Me in Trouble? (November 30, 2016)
  33. Commenter Ignore Button 0.99 (December 21, 2016)
  34. Adding wp.media Multiple Image Selection to WordPress Plug-Ins (January 5, 2017)
  35. Working around an Unexplained Failure of WordPress {$taxonomy} Hooks (January 10, 2017)In Progress: Subscribe!
  36. Better Twitter Embeds 2: Stripping the Convo for the Sake of the Convo (February 19, 2017)

State of the Discussion

+ This is the right site for anyone who hopes to understand this topic. You understand a whole lot its almost hard to argue with you [. . .]
The Ephemeral Sublime vs The Triumph of Death
+ From early on, Trump gave his adversaries abundant excuses to declare him illegitimate, or illegitimate as far as their principles were concerned. To skip ahead [. . .]
Theodicy of Trump – a Tweet-Drizzle (OAG #11)
Wade McKenzie
Comments this threadCommenter Archive
+ Only the retrospective knowledge that Trump, against every establishment anticipation, won the election lends the idea that Hillary Clinton ought to have refused to participate [. . .]
Theodicy of Trump – a Tweet-Drizzle (OAG #11)

From the Featured Archives

Categories

Related