Alright, DOFP makes a little more sense, as does the presence of Trask at the Paris Peace Talks, I guess it makes him akin to the Red Skull, aka Schmidt, a scientist with transnational ambitions, the second time line, which actually brings the mutants to world attention, paradox raises it's head though,
It seems they are going for what the League of Extraordinary Gentleman, might have been if it had been any good as a teleplay
EW had a piece explaining the paradoxes in DOFP, namely the first two films seem to happen because of this one, and X3 goes the way of the last Raimi Spiderman effort,
One roots for Tony Stark, even though he carries a weapon of medium destruction, but at each part of the series, one confronts his opposite, a tycoon, Stane, a criminal, Vanko, and Guy Pierce's character, all amoral creatures,
A superhero is by their nature a deus ex machina, a supervillain like Zod or Magneto, offers the prospect of amorality tied to great power, the Winter Soldier, being a super soldier, comes close to that problem, Lex Luthor, certainly in his Hackman incarnation, is a parody of the American tycoon, who uses technical means, to dark ends,
This last, positing the Paris Peace Talks, as the fulcrum where the whole of history rests, is a bit of a stretch, it's interesting how Mystique becomes the equivalent of a Narodnik, and the consequences she unleashes,
Watchmen was quite grim, 'First Class' was entertaining, because it styled itself inpart as a spy film, with Kevin Bacon doing a decent
Bond Villain, January Jones was one of the weaker elements, as for
DOFP, it embraces the opposite of the Terminator paradox, an action in the president, triggers the dystopian future,
Now one recalls however, the Second International's attack on the Social Democrats as Social Fascists, this knocked them out of contention in the post Bruening coalition government, which ultimately yielded to the Nazis, which is ironic how the Communist then painted themselves as 'premature antifascists' since they had enabled the Nazis rise to power,
Did you ever get around to that comparative tale, of late 18th political developments, the Great Upheaval, it shows how despite some close calls, the US was able to ignite a liberty revolution, whereas the French, lapsed into tyranny, Committee of Public Safety, and Catherina only tasted the enlightenment and Russia returned to repression in short order,
I think the problem with Herbert Croly's publication is content, not appearance, after a poor start, Ioffe has been pretty good on Russia, Snyder on the greater region, but it's hard to think of a writer that stands out, in recent past, and journolisters like Schrieber don't count,
Actually, before I heard of Pestritto, I see it from the classically liberal perspective, which got such short shrift in Bismarck's Germany, along with List, Wagner and Schmoller, re
Caldwell's bio of Hayek, a Lockean view, ultimately the German philosophers you can Nietzche and Schopenhaer, evinced such a negative and ultimately wrong view of human nature, it's not an
accident that shrunken societies arose from that environment,
this is what happens when wars against the family, consequently, what is left, the id, particularly the male id, what happens in the state of nature, to females in that circumstance?
I would beg to differ with Hegel, liberty and tyranny do not coexist, like matter and antimatter they explode, the dialectic does not work, the problem with Fukuyama, pre marxist philosophies were a problem, note Solovviev, in Bely's Petersburg
On the wider point of the state vs. liberty, Person of Interest, has been examining it, from an interesting angle, last season, a
anarchist group, called Vigilance, arose, against the various data mining organizations, one of them is called Decima, well it turned out in the season finale, that the latter group had brought the former into being, as the scapegoat for a terrorist outrage, they
had themselves perpetrated, in order to sanction another more interactive outfit, not unlike the helicarriers in the last Captain America film,
Well libertarian or progressive side of the regime, they have little of the former, in fact community organizing must by it's very nature eschew the former, how else 'to rub raw, the sources of discontent' Sterling I don't care for, apparently his deeds were not significant to stop receiving his danegeld, Eich, a real thought criminal, supported Tom McClintock, a sign of his clear
recidivism,
Paul pere has much stupider things, so feeding the crocodile won't help Rand, even though he has an argument re the Drug War, But on the Trayvon matter, many made a fool of themselves, chief among them Spike Lee, the New Black Panther Party, our version of Boko Haram, similarly can we forget the Dorner groupies, the followers of a homicidal cop,
No, Sterling paid the danegeld, and that protected him, for a time,
Dean was induced to make some remarks, that were outside the scope of a nuisance suit, interestingly she was as fervent a supporter of Obama as any member of the Sirius cybernetic corporation, Robertson,
had an unpolitic but not unremarkable expression, acceptable for some religions and enterprises but not others, Your category error re Bundy, is already wellknown, but one can add another to the mix,
Nicholas Wade formerly of the New York Times,
Really Dugin's Eurasian framework isn't fascism lite, somewhat like
Kolchak had be assumed power, Ukrainian politics have always been
'interesting' in the Chinese sense of the word, populists in Hungary and other places, who are generally pro Volodya,
*Comment archive for non-registered commenters assembled by email address as provided.
Commenter Ignore Button Preview Video November 30, 2016 With this #WordPress Plugin I bestow upon humankind the greatest gift that has ever been given it so far...
Commenter Ignore Button December 8, 2016 Add convenient buttons enabling users to remove all comments by certain commenters from view.
Commenter Ignore Button 0.99 December 21, 2016 Now in "Late Beta" - and, for a limited time, I'll offer free styling, installation, and configuration to anyone who wants to try it out!
Commenter Ignore Button Plug-In Now Available from the WordPress Repo January 24, 2017 Commenter Ignore Button (CIB) lets a user to put one or more commenters "on ignore." To have such an option enabled is a frequent request at blogs and other sites where comment threads are plagued by trolls or other problematic commenters, but where site operators prefer to err on the side of open discussion -…
One Giant Leap for Ordinary Gentlepersonkind (Commenter Ignore Button Use Case) May 28, 2017 "The reality is, on any public forum there is going to be a peanut gallery, and I’ve never seen a moderation policy that can quite eliminate them, but not eliminate interesting people who I want to hear from. So, culled lists, either individually (as here) or collectively (as was needed in a larger space such…
What other than the actual invasion of Iraq under proven-false premises could actually prove those premises false, at least as we articulated them to ourselves while, we believed, safely ignoring the always-wrong and resoundingly re-defeated defeatists?
To the extent we cannot construct or re-construct the principles for a collective right to life in the age of weapons of destruction of the masses and disruption of global-ecological homeostasis, those principles may be expected to construct or re-construct themselves for us, and through us.
(longer version of a comment left at a typically impossible discussion of Carl Schmitt at the Crooked Timber blog.)
the single most interesting question he raises, if not uniquely, then signally, is the constitutional paradox of the constituting/constituted power. That still deserves consideration.
I agree with this observation, and I've read all of JCH's comments on this thread with interest, while recognizing the difficulty and perhaps the impossibility of what he's trying to do here - among other things trying to defend an interest in "the enemy" to the enemy's committed enemies. (THE ENEMY was the title that Gopal Balakrishnan gave to his very useful intellectual biography of Schmitt, published in 2000[ (( The Enemy: An Intellectual Portrait of Carl Schmitt )) ]). Quite often, this very difficult if not impossible exercise coincides with another difficult impossibility: of trying to do philosophy on a blog comment thread.
It is just a bit more than merely ironic that those perplexed by the theory of the primacy for politics of the friend-enemy distinction so frequently and perhaps universally operate from friend-enemy presumptions in their discussion, or most typically in their refusal of actual discussion, of the same concept. That this problem would tend to recur is one strong implication of the theory underlying Schmitt's "Concept of the Political." A second or corollary implication is that this concept of the political implies a politicization of the concept, and finally collapses into or is revealed to rely upon, is an argument or the argument on, the concept of concepts at all. The question of the sovereign decision ex nihilo turns out to be a form of the more general and more basic question of existence ex nihilo - another form of the "why is there something and not nothing?" and another form of the "why am I bothering to offer a comment on a blog thread?" or "why am I declining to continue this discussion?"
(At CT I ended the comment there, but I'll choose here to continue a bit further:)
The explicability of the (any) decision (including the omission or refusal of decision) is inherent in the decision as a potential, but its not being entirely known or knowable, its character not yet having been determined, is what differentiates the decision as decision, or subjective experience/experience of subjectivity or of freedom of the will in the moment of decision (presence as self-presence at all), from that which is to be decided upon and the moment of decision, as concretely the result (result of results) of all decisions already made. "Who has not sat in suspense before his heart's curtain?"
The poet implies that we all have had that experience. One might suggest further that "to be at all as a 'who'" means to be in such suspense. It is in that moment that who one is or we are or we are/always were/are-going-to-be-henceforth is revealed to us, that we reveal ourselves to ourselves, as though from nothing - applying Schmitt's formulation regarding the sovereign decision. Only afterwards, precisely as in the judgment of a crime or in the larger "court of history," the individual's or society's or blog-thread-commenter's or the universe's true character having been revealed, does explanation including causal explanation become possible, though satisfaction, or the decision to be satisfied, necessarily and without exception takes a similar form (as necessity, as the exception). As was quite apparent to Kant and as we all know, but as we always eventually decide to suppress precisely in order to get on with life, the full explanation of the criminal's or the enemy's or our own conduct would eventually vacate the notion of any meaningful decision at all. My bad childhood produced my bad behavior. My bad education produced this incoherent blog comment. My loneliness and self-destructive tendencies explain why I am leaving why I did not leave this comment in full at this that forum full of mainly unsympathetic and even hostile interlocutors. Such totalities of explanation/explanatory totalities, or the position of complete determinism, eliminates subjectivity. They tell us that there never was nor ever is or can be a meaningful decision at all: There was the effect of causes, and the illusion of volition and meaning. Things did things to things, that is all (determinism as physicalist reductionism/eliminationism).
Naturally, inevitably, we or I refuse to accept this concept that has no meaningful spot for us or me, or, to say the same thing, we or I may at most pretend to accept this meaninglessness as meaningful: Either way, the origin of the self appears to be its own self-origination as though from nothing, in this instance in direct confrontation with the thought of its/my own nothingness: I insist on myself, on this now as not yet explicable, as still to be determined. For example, I might take the decision, and make what seems to me a fully reasonable decision, and what may turn out to be or to seem a fully explicable one, but without offering or being able to offer reason or explanation to myself or others, to stop here.
A Levinasian paradox: she was a Polish RC right-wing nationalist bigot, yet she issued an appeal, itself in entirely anti-semitic terms, for the rescue and [...]
Interesting. So you're saying that taken to its logical extreme (which could be either nihilistic or fantastical by the way) liberalism ends up having [...]
On “Open Thread”
Alright, DOFP makes a little more sense, as does the presence of Trask at the Paris Peace Talks, I guess it makes him akin to the Red Skull, aka Schmidt, a scientist with transnational ambitions, the second time line, which actually brings the mutants to world attention, paradox raises it's head though,
"
It seems they are going for what the League of Extraordinary Gentleman, might have been if it had been any good as a teleplay
EW had a piece explaining the paradoxes in DOFP, namely the first two films seem to happen because of this one, and X3 goes the way of the last Raimi Spiderman effort,
"
Click on the main link, it's like the Onion but with less wit,
"
I know Eva Green, but I can't afford those channels, I'll catch a snippet here and there, as with Homeland,
"
One roots for Tony Stark, even though he carries a weapon of medium destruction, but at each part of the series, one confronts his opposite, a tycoon, Stane, a criminal, Vanko, and Guy Pierce's character, all amoral creatures,
"
A superhero is by their nature a deus ex machina, a supervillain like Zod or Magneto, offers the prospect of amorality tied to great power, the Winter Soldier, being a super soldier, comes close to that problem, Lex Luthor, certainly in his Hackman incarnation, is a parody of the American tycoon, who uses technical means, to dark ends,
"
I guess this fits the other thread, not as much category error as that Tablet piece, but quite nearly;
http://www.themillions.com/2014/05/the-survivor-on-magneto-x-men-and-the-holocaust.html
it is this aspect of the X Men that troubles you?
"
the 'Jump the Shark' element, is likely the level of technology in 1973, that would make the Sentinels a little difficult to pull off,
"
This last, positing the Paris Peace Talks, as the fulcrum where the whole of history rests, is a bit of a stretch, it's interesting how Mystique becomes the equivalent of a Narodnik, and the consequences she unleashes,
"
Watchmen was quite grim, 'First Class' was entertaining, because it styled itself inpart as a spy film, with Kevin Bacon doing a decent
Bond Villain, January Jones was one of the weaker elements, as for
DOFP, it embraces the opposite of the Terminator paradox, an action in the president, triggers the dystopian future,
"
So democracy is putting Conyers on the ballot, even if he doesn't
qualify
"
the French Krugman turns out not to be all that, re the Financial Times.
Back when this was a fun blog, one might have speculated on the time travel aspects of 'Days of Future Past'
"
I would say, Britain is becoming less democratic, as more of it is ruled by decrees, from the EU, although the UKIP might reverse that.
By the way, the new X Men, setting the fulcrum point in the '73 Paris Peace Talks,' jumps a mutant,
On “The Hebraic Heidegger (Another Discussion Not To Be Held)”
Now one recalls however, the Second International's attack on the Social Democrats as Social Fascists, this knocked them out of contention in the post Bruening coalition government, which ultimately yielded to the Nazis, which is ironic how the Communist then painted themselves as 'premature antifascists' since they had enabled the Nazis rise to power,
On “Scrapheap 2014.05.12 – People like Bundy, Eich, Sterling, Robertson, Deen, and Spinoza”
I picked it up second hand, in a supermarket sale, as a paperback, I'm still kind of traditional that way,
"
Did you ever get around to that comparative tale, of late 18th political developments, the Great Upheaval, it shows how despite some close calls, the US was able to ignite a liberty revolution, whereas the French, lapsed into tyranny, Committee of Public Safety, and Catherina only tasted the enlightenment and Russia returned to repression in short order,
On “one cheer for TNR’s re-re-design”
I think the problem with Herbert Croly's publication is content, not appearance, after a poor start, Ioffe has been pretty good on Russia, Snyder on the greater region, but it's hard to think of a writer that stands out, in recent past, and journolisters like Schrieber don't count,
On “Scrapheap 2014.05.12 – People like Bundy, Eich, Sterling, Robertson, Deen, and Spinoza”
Actually, before I heard of Pestritto, I see it from the classically liberal perspective, which got such short shrift in Bismarck's Germany, along with List, Wagner and Schmoller, re
Caldwell's bio of Hayek, a Lockean view, ultimately the German philosophers you can Nietzche and Schopenhaer, evinced such a negative and ultimately wrong view of human nature, it's not an
accident that shrunken societies arose from that environment,
On “Open Thread”
this is what happens when wars against the family, consequently, what is left, the id, particularly the male id, what happens in the state of nature, to females in that circumstance?
On “Scrapheap 2014.05.12 – People like Bundy, Eich, Sterling, Robertson, Deen, and Spinoza”
I would beg to differ with Hegel, liberty and tyranny do not coexist, like matter and antimatter they explode, the dialectic does not work, the problem with Fukuyama, pre marxist philosophies were a problem, note Solovviev, in Bely's Petersburg
On ““the belief that gay people are evil””
On the wider point of the state vs. liberty, Person of Interest, has been examining it, from an interesting angle, last season, a
anarchist group, called Vigilance, arose, against the various data mining organizations, one of them is called Decima, well it turned out in the season finale, that the latter group had brought the former into being, as the scapegoat for a terrorist outrage, they
had themselves perpetrated, in order to sanction another more interactive outfit, not unlike the helicarriers in the last Captain America film,
On “Scrapheap 2014.05.12 – People like Bundy, Eich, Sterling, Robertson, Deen, and Spinoza”
Well libertarian or progressive side of the regime, they have little of the former, in fact community organizing must by it's very nature eschew the former, how else 'to rub raw, the sources of discontent' Sterling I don't care for, apparently his deeds were not significant to stop receiving his danegeld, Eich, a real thought criminal, supported Tom McClintock, a sign of his clear
recidivism,
"
Paul pere has much stupider things, so feeding the crocodile won't help Rand, even though he has an argument re the Drug War, But on the Trayvon matter, many made a fool of themselves, chief among them Spike Lee, the New Black Panther Party, our version of Boko Haram, similarly can we forget the Dorner groupies, the followers of a homicidal cop,
"
No, Sterling paid the danegeld, and that protected him, for a time,
Dean was induced to make some remarks, that were outside the scope of a nuisance suit, interestingly she was as fervent a supporter of Obama as any member of the Sirius cybernetic corporation, Robertson,
had an unpolitic but not unremarkable expression, acceptable for some religions and enterprises but not others, Your category error re Bundy, is already wellknown, but one can add another to the mix,
Nicholas Wade formerly of the New York Times,
On “Open Thread”
Really Dugin's Eurasian framework isn't fascism lite, somewhat like
Kolchak had be assumed power, Ukrainian politics have always been
'interesting' in the Chinese sense of the word, populists in Hungary and other places, who are generally pro Volodya,
*Comment archive for non-registered commenters assembled by email address as provided.