December 29, 2013
All the other guys and gals, the losers and the second-raters, the backworldspeople, are the ones who need policy and strategy: The Neo-Empire or Empire of Liberty is its own strategy and is by "being there" already the final determinant of every policy and politics. Hegemony is. It simply "lives hegemonically." All else on Earth if not necessarily in Heaven (nor necessarily not) is secondary, though perhaps usefully diversionary, since an achieved new consensus, as we occasionally set out to remind ourselves, would be counterproductive compared to the actual, virtually inarticulable but pre-eminently successful one, and possibly the sole true danger to it.
Continued
December 12, 2012
If I could stand above the heavens,
I would draw my sword
And cut you in three parts:
One piece for Europe,
One piece for America,
One piece left for China.
Then peace would rule the world.
Continued
On “All the little Tea Party Americans in the world”
@ CK MacLeod:
You do not spring, full blown, like Minerva from the head of Zeus?
"
only fluffing the robot because the robot was fluffing you, Tsar, you've been sounding like a fair fluffing would do wonders in getting your head up.
(and I'm almost surprised to hear that you admit to have heard of fluffing, you show-bizzing rascal)
On “Van Jones vs Hot Air”
@ CK MacLeod:
can i quote you on part of that?
BIG BILLMOOSE reports!!
CK MacLeod: I WAS ANDREW BREITBART!
"
@ narciso:
hey narc, as the second and third albums by the Sarah Palin Experience have gotten played, it's become a lot easier to recognize that it's all derivative drivel from an airhead guitarist.
On “Andy-McCarthyism”
I'm fine, and fully fond of f, first and foremost.
(nice company that you've found for me, albeit not for them. you've pretty fine taste.)
"
Libby wrote:
exactly how much of a concern is it, Libby, if there isn't any of it?
getting crushed by the carcass of a catapulted cow is a concern.
On “All the little Tea Party Americans in the world”
@ Randy Mader:
This occasionally is a pretty good site and our Tsar oft merits all the rose petals.
On “Andy-McCarthyism”
CK MacLeod wrote:
you would be on pretty safe ground in saying that it's faulty. reading no more than what's here to read, and not the decision, I would hope that the judge's words reflect nothing beyond a single point of consideration in sentencing, because "he didn't think it was a bad idea" ain't an excuse.
if the judge used it as grounds for finding the defendant not guilty, it's an outrageous error and a Tsar tip-toeing around that is a Tsar infringing on the rights of the people and the law of the realm.
On “Van Jones vs Hot Air”
@ The Monster:
You suggesting that there's something wrong in boycotting Glenn Beck?
"
@ narciso:
you mean that there was something wrong in returning the Gonzalez child?
"
@ CK MacLeod:
he can't help it. Cubanist communist fellow-travelers such as narc (and anyone who ever gave him a lollypop) all adhere to a strict Stalinist line and regard Maoists with typical Cuban hatred and loathing, often looking to steal hair, fingernail parings or menstrual blood for their semi-traditional Stalinist/West African ritual enchantments/purges, (and personal enjoyment).
"
@ narciso:
narc, you don't get to call them officials .... when they aren't.
were they officials or employees.?
when did McGovern or Madsen last hold employment in the gov't?
(non-rhetorical questions, 'preciate if you know the when of them)
"
CK MacLeod wrote:
1) he's a lawyer.
if that's insufficient, there's
2) the first thing you learn in contracts is...... don't sign it 'till you understand every last funky bit of it.
3) and yes, if you listen carefully to the explanation on the vid, he did consent.
that's enough for probably, IMO.
"
@ CK MacLeod:
probably FOS
so sure he’s lying.
one of these things is not like the other
"
@ CK MacLeod:
if you read what I've said, I've not agreed with calling him a troofer. I go as far as " fool what rendered himself unsuitable for employment fool".
"
@ CK MacLeod: Nonsense. It's quite easy to speak of annihilating members of the organization until such time as the remaining members cease speaking the language of annihilation and ask for talks.
"
@ CK MacLeod:My position is that he's probably FOS but it doesn't matter whether he willingly signed that thing or was duped into signing.
Either is sufficient to render him an unwholesome addition to the executive branch of the federal government given that the petition demands that the previous administration be investigated because it was guilty of treason and the administration hosting Jones denies the truth of the charge and refuses to undertake such an investigation.
Bluntly, no damned lawyer could sign that thing and still serve.
"
CK MacLeod wrote:
yes, you can, quite legitimately. it's a suitable reply to people speaking that language.
"
Van Jones was correct in resigning. The petition was a major error.
"
@ Zoltan Newberry:
no Zolt, neither club is worth the price of admission.
"
@ The Monster:
anybody who claims this to be a money quote is about simple enough to forget to wipe the Elmer's Glue-All off their fingers before picking their nose.
On “Bleeding Heart Conservatives”
@ narciso:
Now do something UNUSUAL, and explain why………..
“blocked any consideration of any contrary talking point.”……
isn’t just you being shull of fit.
Please, for one time, EXPLAIN and provide some sane, germane explain instead of just more of same being a pain.
Now adding …….
There is very little grounds to that critique, but it doesn’t stop virtually every publication
on god’s green earth, from repeating it.
Now adding......
"
@ narciso:
narc, you remain mostly a hollow-headed hunk of silly, as usual.
Now do something UNUSUAL, and explain why………..
“blocked any consideration of any contrary talking point.”……
isn’t just you being shull of fit.
Please, for one time, EXPLAIN and provide some sane, germane explain instead of just more of same being a pain.
Now adding .......
There is very little grounds to that critique, but it doesn’t stop virtually every publication
on god’s green earth, from repeating it.
On “East is West and West is East and Never the Met Are Twain (light posting)”
narc, Is it much 'mudgeonly to flog the expired draypulller and ask you read comments 1 & 2 and then read the conclusion of the post
"
@ narciso:narc, read the post again and respond to the main point and I promise to stop pulling your tail.
Matter of fact, I'll go easy regardless. I still think you're cute.
But I would sure appreciate an occasional lapse into logic, just for the reassurance of it.