@ narciso:
so newnarc, old crumpet, bit of a wet bird when from the foo is on the other shoot, can we stipulate? That DiCaprio mannequin is he at most withal and else little.
likewise, is there a reason why you don't answer and instead dice with danger when clarity is called for in the moment?
do you even pretend to any loyalty to the Laws of logic enshrined by out Forefathers and beloved of True-Blue Americans?
your problem is garlic, leastwise in the early stages, when it's still just a shoot sprouting.
yep, you can't, it seems, and don't try to correct me if I'm wrong, because that's not really in the tradition of patriarchal Latin culture (such as it is), yep, yep, mostly early-on you got to get away with sprouting shoot all over this blog cause people affirmatively acted on your comments thinking that you didn't really unnerstand the King's American like you oughta.
now what, I ask?
can you be saved by being sent to a charter camp for the logically absent?
newtciso, we don't need more bad arguments. give us a couple of solid honest ones where you respond to discussion instead of slithering sideways. then we'll know that the rest of the time you're kidding and not a newtjob.
@ CK MacLeod: and if they didn't know that narc and people just like him were going to read that stuff and buy into it, they would never have published it.
narc is responsible for everything wrong in the universe, at the very least.
@ narciso:
so newnarc, old crumpet, bit of a wet bird when from the foo is on the other shoot, can we stipulate? That DiCaprio mannequin is he at most withal and else little.
likewise, is there a reason why you don't answer and instead dice with danger when clarity is called for in the moment?
do you even pretend to any loyalty to the Laws of logic enshrined by out Forefathers and beloved of True-Blue Americans?
@ narciso:
That's our newtjob!!
(DiCaprio is a lousy actor)
your problem is garlic, leastwise in the early stages, when it's still just a shoot sprouting.
yep, you can't, it seems, and don't try to correct me if I'm wrong, because that's not really in the tradition of patriarchal Latin culture (such as it is), yep, yep, mostly early-on you got to get away with sprouting shoot all over this blog cause people affirmatively acted on your comments thinking that you didn't really unnerstand the King's American like you oughta.
now what, I ask?
can you be saved by being sent to a charter camp for the logically absent?
@ narciso:
newtciso, we don't need more bad arguments. give us a couple of solid honest ones where you respond to discussion instead of slithering sideways. then we'll know that the rest of the time you're kidding and not a newtjob.
@ Rex Caruthers:narc knows, and can recall, an incredible amount of information. he has a lively and sly wit and I much enjoy it.
and his creativity in framing arguments transcends any and all bounds of logic known to mortal men and frogs.
he should be turned into a newt until he gets better at honesty in argumentation.
@ CK MacLeod: and if they didn't know that narc and people just like him were going to read that stuff and buy into it, they would never have published it.
narc is responsible for everything wrong in the universe, at the very least.
@ Sully:
Bless you, Sully. Thinking that we're fighting for the oil, rather than we got stuck there because of the oil, is shallow.
If it's a problem, couldn't we then just blow it up?
Not that long ago, the swarthy cabbies with the body odor were Jews, Zolt.
Try to remember that while you're spewing your ship.
'' We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children ''
was not included in the final musical selection for the ad