@ miguel cervantes: kinda hard to believe that there were non-liberals in your family circle.

@ Scott Miller:
you thinking Dennis Miller for Saddam?

miguel cervantes wrote:

You are smoking something seriously

can't be as good as the stuff the niece brought from Hawaii. I caught her walking barefoot around the roof of the house this afternoon.

@ George Jochnowitz: skip the part about "OK"(wherever that come from) and help me out by explaining the sanctions sentence about which I asked.

@ miguel cervantes: That's silly. He's as capable of thuggery as an anorexic eighth grader.

George Jochnowitz wrote:

Iran has provoked the world to impose sanctions upon it so that it can build bombs.

Could you explain why that sentence isn't backwards?

"Iran has no tangible quarrel with Israel"

Iran's theocrats have a very real quarrel, to their thinking, with any non-Islamic regime holding what they believe to be ground belonging to their religion.

Iran is also quite happy to use the Palestinians to gain influence over the Middle East. Their revolution requires export and delegitimizing the Saudis and then the Egyptians.

@ George Jochnowitz: George, that little idiot says something or other is going to result in the end of the Zionist regime every week or two.

skrew him and the Ayatollah that rode in on him.

@ CK MacLeod: I live to serve.

@ CK MacLeod:
any reason why Scott couldn't put together an essay for your perusal on some topic or maybe a book review????

@ miguel cervantes:well, seeing as how you haven't answered any of my other questions, why shouldn't I expect a clear answer when I ask

It’s the pattern Frog, he tells us in not so many words, that we ‘got what coming to us’, that we have more Moslem blood on our hands
than AQ, that Hamas is misunderstood

what the hell that means and are you discussing Rauf?

@ miguel cervantes:

What're you saying? There are a zillion mosques around. What's one more? and what does building this one have to do with a half-dozen bad guys from a half-dozen other places?

and none of them have horses inside AFAIK.

@ miguel cervantes:Let's see

1) It is no coincidence that Islamists routinely use the term ghazva to describe the 9/11 attacks against New York and Washington. The terrorists who carried out the attack are referred to as ghazis or shahids (martyrs).

2) To all those who believe and hope that the 9/11 ghazva would lead to the destruction of the American "Great Satan," this would be of great symbolic value.

3) great symbolic value to those who want a high-profile, "in your face" projection of Islam in the infidel West.

This is truly amazing. Radical Islamists don't like us and are in favor of building mosques in Manhattan.

Here's my question for you, narc. Who gives a shirt about what radical Islamists think and why should we be changing the rules about what we do in NYC because of them?

We blow their butts up when its possible and appropriate and frustrate them when we can. That's enough time and attention devoted to them.