It assembles a dossier, I guess, then decorates it with a bit of insistence on the genius and awesomeness of people who have different views. That's not responding to anything except to the existence of the likes of Naomi Klein by "contradicting" it with the existence of Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Milton Friedman and the awesome Mark Humphrys whoever that is.
Well, that was non-responsive - unless you consider inane insults and repetitious re-statement of one's core beliefs to be "responsive." I'd call it childish.
It assembles a dossier, I guess, then decorates it with a bit of insistence on the genius and awesomeness of people who have different views. That's not responding to anything except to the existence of the likes of Naomi Klein by "contradicting" it with the existence of Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Milton Friedman and the awesome Mark Humphrys whoever that is.
Well, that was non-responsive - unless you consider inane insults and repetitious re-statement of one's core beliefs to be "responsive." I'd call it childish.
Was this one of your recommendatons?
Seed