Comments on The perfect speech… by miguel cervantes

He is exceedingly dense, the problem is any notion of a sensible center right regime, went by the wayside when Hugenberg fell,
they were running through a musical chairs of old Junkers like Von Papen, and the like, at this point, the postmaster would eventually become chancellor. Of course, there is a certain category error in comparing events then to 2001, among other things, the Nazis were waging a paramilitary campaign on the remains of the Government, and they were inadvertently aided
by Stalin, because he wanted the Social Democrats out,

Actually Jesus's political message was rather clear, hence 'Render under Caesar'
of course, Emperors were worshipped as gods, which made thing problematic.

Actually if you read Kagan on Thucydides, you find from the sources he investigated, that he thought to hide Pericle's role in the Pelopenessian debacle, and attribute it more to what he considered declasse figures like Cleon,

Judge all of Strauss's work, by one letter in 1933, forgetting that any number of philosophers like George Bernard Shaw, and even this fellow, was taken in a much later time;

http://business.highbeam.com/434953/article-1G1-57513456/web-du-bois-nazi-germany-surprising-prescient-visitor

Now the Baath, which still rules the roost in Syria, was the Arab import by Aflaq of Fascism, with a little communism thrown in for flavoring, of course, the most diligent opposition, against them, is as was put forth in another context, another kind of evil'
that is Salafi and Wahhabism,

No, the antithesis of the bourgeois, is feudalism, what existed for a 1,000 years before, that is a pretensious and stupid notion,

Well it could be he was updating Orwell' 'Politics of the English Language', language should be plainly understood.