In 2004, Falk wrote the preface to David Ray Griffin's book The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11 which maintains that the George W. Bush administration was complicit in the September 11 attacks.[76] In that preface he argued: "There have been questions raised here and there and allegations of official complicity made almost from the day of the attacks, especially in Europe, but no one until Griffin has had the patience, the fortitude, the courage, and the intelligence to put the pieces together in a single coherent account."[37] Falk also wrote a chapter for Griffin's 2006 book, 9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out.[77]
He was at last count, a UN special reporteur on the occupied territorities, and a borderline 9/11 denialist, he was the one who thought Khomeini would turn out like Gandhi
Well as we know we're not spared the consequences of any revolution, now you want to be thought a fool like Foucault and Falk, although the latter has gone on to greater extents of foolishness and mendacity,
He's been the former since 2008, and as for;
In 2004, Falk wrote the preface to David Ray Griffin's book The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11 which maintains that the George W. Bush administration was complicit in the September 11 attacks.[76] In that preface he argued: "There have been questions raised here and there and allegations of official complicity made almost from the day of the attacks, especially in Europe, but no one until Griffin has had the patience, the fortitude, the courage, and the intelligence to put the pieces together in a single coherent account."[37] Falk also wrote a chapter for Griffin's 2006 book, 9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out.[77]
He was at last count, a UN special reporteur on the occupied territorities, and a borderline 9/11 denialist, he was the one who thought Khomeini would turn out like Gandhi
http://www.jadaliyya.com/pages/index/9348/all-armies_-the-syrian-regime-the-fsa-and-islamist
Well as we know we're not spared the consequences of any revolution, now you want to be thought a fool like Foucault and Falk, although the latter has gone on to greater extents of foolishness and mendacity,
http://observers.france24.com/content/20121231-egyptian-revolution-trees-heliopolis-cut-down
So, in the end, you weren't for a liberal revolution, ala Zaghul, you make my point for me,