Star-Spangled Banner Archives

For the Fourth: Holy American Major League of Nations (Notes on Baseball, Booze, and the Re-De-Nationalization of Americanism)

It welcomed the tests of time/
Like an eternal friend,/
Our country is blessed,/
Our country is such!

Holy American Major League of Nations (Notes on Baseball and the Re-De-Nationalization of Americanism)

It welcomed the tests of time/
Like an eternal friend,/
Our country is blessed,/
Our country is such!

genomisia

(4)

August 10, 2014

notes, Philology, Philosophyantisemitism bigotry definitions genocide Islamophobia

genomisia

(4)

August 10, 2014

notes, Philology, Philosophyantisemitism bigotry definitions genocide Islamophobia

Proposed definition: genomisia- n. - from genos ("race, stock, kin") + -misia ("hatred of") : hatred or actualized animus toward any group as characterized by common religion, ethnic or national origin, ideology, customary conduct, or orientation; also misogeny.

Continued

Comment →

All the News that’s Fit to Kill (OAG #8)

(13)

February 22, 2017

Internet, Journalism, Operation American Greatness

All the News that’s Fit to Kill (OAG #8)

(13)

February 22, 2017

Internet, Journalism, Operation American Greatness

The Post appears to be promising to narrate the death of democracy - or, if unconsciously, to be revealing an intention to embody it.

Continued

Comment →

Notes on A Living Originalism

(17)

May 21, 2013

Legal Philosophy, Political Philosophy, The Exception, US HistoryAmericanism Constitutionalism Living Constitution Living Originalism Originalism Paul W Kahn Popular Sovereignty

Notes on A Living Originalism

(17)

May 21, 2013

Legal Philosophy, Political Philosophy, The Exception, US HistoryAmericanism Constitutionalism Living Constitution Living Originalism Originalism Paul W Kahn Popular Sovereignty

The purpose of this unusually long post is to review and expand upon a discussion under a set of posts by Tim Kowal and Burt Likko, who are practicing attorneys with interest in Constitutional Law, on doctrines of Constitutional interpretation. The perhaps still distant objective is a framework for a “synthetic originalism” or “vital originalism” or “living originalism,” or a Unified Theory or at least Adequate Description of American Constitutionalism…

Continued

Comment →

Featured Archive →

Noted & Quoted

Keith Spencer: …data shows that a centrist Democrat would be a losing candidate – Salon.com

(3)

Political Philosophy, Politics2020 Election

Keith Spencer: …data shows that a centrist Democrat would be a losing candidate – Salon.com

(3)

Political Philosophy, Politics2020 Election

TV pundits and op-ed writers of every major newspaper epitomize how the Democratic establishment has already reached a consensus: the 2020 nominee must be a centrist, a Joe Biden, Cory Booker or Kamala Harris–type, preferably. They say that Joe Biden should "run because [his] populist image fits the Democrats’ most successful political strategy of the past generation" (David Leonhardt, New York Times), and though Biden "would be far from an ideal president," he "looks most like the person who could beat Trump" (David Ignatius, Washington Post). Likewise, the same elite pundit class is working overtime to torpedo left-Democratic candidates like Sanders.

For someone who was not acquainted with Piketty's paper, the argument for a centrist Democrat might sound compelling. If the country has tilted to the right, should we elect a candidate closer to the middle than the fringe? If the electorate resembles a left-to-right line, and each voter has a bracketed range of acceptability in which they vote, this would make perfect sense. The only problem is that it doesn't work like that, as Piketty shows.

The reason is that nominating centrist Democrats who don't speak to class issues will result in a great swathe of voters simply not voting. Conversely, right-wing candidates who speak to class issues, but who do so by harnessing a false consciousness — i.e. blaming immigrants and minorities for capitalism's ills, rather than capitalists — will win those same voters who would have voted for a more class-conscious left candidate. Piketty calls this a "bifurcated" voting situation, meaning many voters will connect either with far-right xenophobic nationalists or left-egalitarian internationalists, but perhaps nothing in-between.

From: There is hard data that shows that a centrist Democrat would be a losing candidate | Salon.com

Comment →

Eli Zaretsky: Trump’s Charisma – LRB Blog

(5)

Political Philosophy, Politics2020 Election

Eli Zaretsky: Trump’s Charisma – LRB Blog

(5)

Political Philosophy, Politics2020 Election

Understanding Trump’s charisma offers important clues to understanding the problems that the Democrats need to address. Most important, the Democratic candidate must convey a sense that he or she will fulfil the promise of 2008: not piecemeal reform but a genuine, full-scale change in America’s way of thinking. It’s also crucial to recognise that, like Britain, America is at a turning point and must go in one direction or another. Finally, the candidate must speak to Americans’ sense of self-respect linked to social justice and inclusion. While Weber’s analysis of charisma arose from the German situation, it has special relevance to the United States of America, the first mass democracy, whose Constitution invented the institution of the presidency as a recognition of the indispensable role that unique individuals play in history.

From: Trump’s Charisma

Comment →

Matt Yglesias: Trump’s latest big interview is both funny and terrifying – Vox

(0)

Operation American Greatness

Matt Yglesias: Trump’s latest big interview is both funny and terrifying – Vox

(0)

Operation American Greatness

[E]ven Fox didn’t tout Bartiromo’s big scoops on Trump’s legislative agenda, because 10 months into the Trump presidency, nobody is so foolish as to believe that him saying, “We’re doing a big infrastructure bill,” means that the Trump administration is, in fact, doing a big infrastructure bill. The president just mouths off at turns ignorantly and dishonestly, and nobody pays much attention to it unless he says something unusually inflammatory.On some level, it’s a little bit funny. On another level, Puerto Rico is still languishing in the dark without power (and in many cases without safe drinking water) with no end in sight. Trump is less popular at this point in his administration than any previous president despite a generally benign economic climate, and shows no sign of changing course. Perhaps it will all work out for the best, and someday we’ll look back and chuckle about the time when we had a president who didn’t know anything about anything that was happening and could never be counted on to make coherent, factual statements on any subject. But traditionally, we haven’t elected presidents like that — for what have always seemed like pretty good reasons — and the risks of compounding disaster are still very much out there.

From: Trump’s latest big interview is both funny and terrifying - Vox

Comment →

All N'd & Q'd →

2013-02-02 8:42 am
Voegelin’s Gnosis, Part 2: Crossing
bob
John 3:16 encapsulates a question, is belief static or dynamic? I believe threfore I am saved. Or, I believe and every action [...]
2015-08-03 1:11 pm
Voegelin’s Gnosis, Part 3: Anismism
bob
I enjoyed this one.
I have been immersed in a similar matrix of issues on the Tibetan Buddhist side now for almost 2 years. The [...]
2015-05-16 12:52 pm
To Wade McKenzie
Negative Action
CK MacLeod
Now, I could point out that this site is my site. I pay for it. I built it. I maintain it. All of its content [...]